Pedestrian Blamed Failure to Remove Ice for Fractured Ankle
On March 1, 2015, at about 2 a.m., plaintiff Doris Kelly, 50, was walking on the sidewalk at 2710 W. Oxford St., in Northwest Philadelphia, when she slipped and fell on ice. She claimed a fracture of her right ankle.
October 18, 2018 at 04:38 PM
3 minute read
Kelly v. Chenault
$30,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: May 14.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 170203354.
Judge: Charles J. Cunningham III.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip-and-fall.
Injuries: Ankle fracture.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Jay L. Solnick, Solnick & Associates, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Kenneth J. Martin, podiatry surgery, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Danielle Chenault, pro se.
Comment:
On March 1, 2015, at about 2 a.m., plaintiff Doris Kelly, 50, was walking on the sidewalk at 2710 W. Oxford St., in Northwest Philadelphia, when she slipped and fell on ice. She claimed a fracture of her right ankle.
Kelly sued property owner Danielle Chenault, alleging that she was negligent in maintaining the property, creating a dangerous condition. Counsel faulted Chenault for not remediating the ice, by either salting or attempting to remove it.
Chenault testified that she had properly treated the sidewalk, and faulted Kelly for failing to use extra caution while walking in the area at night.
Kelly was assisted by a passerby and taken by ambulance to an emergency room. She was diagnosed with a bimalleolar fracture of her right ankle and discharged.
For the next six weeks, Kelly remained non-weight-bearing, then had open reduction and internal fixation surgery for her fracture, with a plate and screws implanted. Following surgery, Kelly consulted with her surgeon and eventually had a six-month course of physical therapy, which consisted of exercise. No further treatment was rendered, and Kelly sought to recover a Department of Public Welfare lien of approximately $5,000.
Kelly's cited her medical records to causally relate her injury and treatment to the accident.
Kelly testified that her ankle injury caused her to become dependent on her children, who lived with her. This included helping with activities of daily living, including bathing, cooking and shopping. Kelly testified that she has difficulty going up and down stairs. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Chenault did not dispute Kelly's injuries and treatment.
The court found that Chenault was liable for Kelly's accident and injuries and awarded Kelly damages of $30,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. The pro se defendant was not asked to contribute.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
3 minute readDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readMatt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute readPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 2The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
- 3Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 4Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 5Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250