Court Records Opened in $19.5M Birth Injury Case
A Lackawanna County judge has opened court records in a case involving a $19.5 million settlement between a mother whose child was born with brain damage and a hospital.
October 25, 2018 at 04:34 PM
4 minute read
Hughes v. Wilkes-Barre Hospital
$19.5M Settlement
Date of Settlement: Unsealed Oct. 21.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Lackawanna No.16 CV 6463.
Judge: Terrence Nealon.Type of Action: Medical malpractice.
Injuries: Birth Injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Matthew Casey, Ross Feller Casey, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Stuart O'Neal, Burns White, Philadelphia; James Doherty, Scanlon, Howley & Doherty, Scranton; Howard Stevens, Gross McGinley, Philadelphia.
Comment:
A Lackawanna County judge has opened court records in a case involving a $19.5 million settlement between a mother whose child was born with brain damage and a hospital.
Lackawanna Court of Common Pleas Judge Terrence Nealon denied the defendants' motion to permanently seal the case.
The plaintiff, Carolina Hughes, sued several Lackawanna County health care professionals, arguing their conduct caused her son to be born with a hypoxic brain injury that left him dependent on a feeding tube, and unable to walk, crawl or stand. The defendants included Wilkes-Barre General Hospital, OB-GYN Associates, Moses Taylor Hospital and two doctors.
According to Nealon's opinion, the defendants had argued that the settlement should be sealed to spare them possible embarrassment and to make them more receptive to future settlement offers. They also argued that the settlement amount was not of interest to the public.
“The secrecy interests identified by the defendants do not defeat the presumption in favor of open judicial records so as to justify the court-sanctioned secrecy of the settlements,” Nealon wrote in his opinion. “Affording the public access to voluntary malpractice settlements also serves the public interest by serving consumers with information that they deem relevant to their health care decisions.”
Of the $19.5 million settlement, $6.8 million was devoted to attorney fees for Philadelphia-based Ross Feller Casey, who represented the plaintiffs. Attorney Matthew Casey did not respond to a request for comment.
Burns White attorney Stuart O'Neal is representing Wilkes-Barre Hospital. James Doherty of Scanlon, Howley & Doherty is representing OB-GYN Associates and Dr. Lori DelGaudio. Gross McGinley attorney Howard Stevens is handling the case for Moses Taylor Hospital. None of the three attorneys returned calls seeking comment.
According to a previous opinion from Nealon, Hughes alleged that she came to the OB-GYN Associates offices on Sept. 6, 2012, which was 19 days before the baby's due date. She complained of a headache, dizziness, nausea, backache, hypertension and possible decreased fetal movement, Nealon said.
The practice called Theresa Baseski, the on-call obstetrician, who was located at Wilkes-Barre General Hospital and gave instructions to the staff over the phone, Nealon said. According to the allegations in the complaint, Hughes was sent home with instructions to “take Tylenol every four-to-six hours for her headache, to apply Bengay cream for back pain, and to eat bland food for the rest of the day.”
The next day Hughes returned to OB-GYN Associates and was seen by DelGaudio, who is also a defendant in the case. Testing was performed, which showed a decrease in the fetal heart rate, and an abnormal biophysical profile.
Hughes contended that DelGaudio also delayed in properly treating her by waiting more than two hours to send Hughes to the hospital, and that there was another delay in treatment after DelGaudio ordered the cesarean section.
Hughes contended, among other things, that Baseski or staff at OB-GYN Associates should have ordered a biophysical profile, performed an ultrasound or recommended she go to a hospital. That conduct, along with the staff's recommendation that she take Tylenol, Bengay and eat bland food, amounted to acting “recklessly indifferent,” Hughes contended.
—P.J. D'Annunzio, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readRule 126(b) Citations to Unpublished Opinions: Some of Us Still Don’t Get It
6 minute readProposed 'Bulk Sensitive Personal Data' Rule and the DOJ’s Comprehensive National Security Regulations
7 minute readThe Importance of Plaintiffs Not Letting Defendants Dictate Settlement Tax Strategies
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250