Cosby: Schnader Billed Six-Figure Fees for 'Unnecessary' Work
Facing a claim for $282,000 in allegedly unpaid fees from his criminal case, Bill Cosby countered that the work was never authorized.
October 26, 2018 at 02:51 PM
4 minute read
In a dispute with a Philadelphia law firm stemming from his criminal case, Bill Cosby is claiming that he did not authorize the amount of legal work for which his former local counsel demanded fees.
In an answer filed Wednesday, Cosby said he did not breach his contract with Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis. The firm has sued Cosby for more than $282,000 in legal fees.
Cosby admitted to paying more than $44,000 for some of the work performed by Schnader partner Sam Silver. But after that, the filing said, “It is however expressly denied that plaintiff was entitled to subsequent payment for the alleged performance of legal work that was unauthorized or redundant legal work completed by lead counsel Thomas Mesereau or his team.”
Mesereau was admitted pro hac vice to lead Cosby's criminal defense ahead of his retrial, which took place in 2018 in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas. Silver was local counsel, entering his appearance in the criminal case in August 2017, until he withdrew in January.
Specifically, Cosby contends in his answer that neither Mesereau nor Cosby directed Silver to perform $183,000 of legal work in early 2018.
“As counsel of record plaintiff could not and did not reasonably provide legal services totaling $183,000 over the course of two months,” his answer said. “Upon information and belief, any alleged legal work performed was unnecessary, duplicative of work performed by lead counsel, inflated and therefore unauthorized and inappropriate.”
According to Schnader's complaint, Cosby signed an engagement letter with the firm in March 2016, just a few months after the criminal charges against Cosby were filed in Montgomery County. Cosby paid for work completed through the end of June 2017, the complaint said, but has not paid any of the firm's invoices submitted between August 2017 and July 25 of this year.
Silver continued to represent Cosby leading up to the comedian's April 2018 criminal proceedings, the complaint said, despite not receiving payments from Cosby. His firm billed about $183,000 in December 2017 and January 2018 alone, it said, and withdrew from the case in late January.
Schnader filed the case in Montgomery County in September, but it was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. In his answer, Cosby contends that he is a citizen of Massachusetts rather than Pennsylvania. Although he is currently residing in state prison in Pennsylvania, after being sentenced last month to three to 10 years in prison for aggravated indecent assault.
In a statement Friday, Schnader said, “We're disappointed and surprised to see that the new lawyers for a client on whose behalf we worked very hard would file such a baseless pleading.”
Central Pennsylvania-based lawyers Vincent Champion and Kayla Rost of Champion Law Office are now representing Cosby in the fee dispute.
In the criminal case, in which Cosby is pursuing an appeal, Harrisburg lawyers Brian Perry and Kristen Weisenberger entered their appearance earlier this month. Joseph P. Green and Peter Goldberger, who represented Cosby at sentencing, withdrew from the criminal case.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readPa. Superior Court's Next Leader Looks Ahead to Looming Challenges in Coming Years
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250