Fraud Claims Against Tucker Arensberg Attorneys Set for ADR
The Pittsburgh law firm faces claims that it misrepresented a client's ownership of a $3 million piece of land.
October 31, 2018 at 04:30 PM
3 minute read
Pittsburgh law firm Tucker Arensberg and a Florida oil-and-gas company will go to mediation over claims that the law firm engaged in fraudulent conduct in the sale of a $3 million property in Pennsylvania.
Prime Energy and Chemical has alleged that Tucker Arensberg, through lawyers Michael Shiner and Kenneth Carroll, misrepresented its client's ownership of a property in McKean County that Prime Energy contracted to buy. Prime Energy filed a suit against Tucker Arensberg in March. The parties filed a stipulation on Oct. 26 agreeing to mediation, which is set to take place in December.
In its original complaint, Prime Energy alleged that it suffered damages of over $35 million from the alleged fraud, as well as $678,800 in lost deposits and other payments.
According to Prime Energy's second amended complaint, also filed Oct. 26, Tucker Arensberg represented Mark Thompson and Mid-East Oil Co.
Prime Energy alleged that the law firm misrepresented Thompson's ownership of the 2,352-acre property in McKean County, referred to as Swamp Angel Property. The property was owned by a company called MarcellX, the complaint said, which Thompson purported to own, but which was actually owned by another family.
In October 2015, Prime Energy paid a $600,000 deposit, which was delivered to an account owned by Thompson, as well as an additional $78,800 to further the sale of the $3 million property, the complaint said. But Prime Energy alleges that money never made it to the escrow account it was intended for.
According to the complaint, Prime Energy discovered in March 2016 that the actual owners of MarcellX were David Prushnok, G. Daniel Prushnok and John Prushnok. Prime Energy then entered a purchase agreement with the Prushnoks to acquire the Swamp Angel Property for $3 million.
“The Prushnoks were not represented by Tucker Arensberg and Shiner, who had misrepresented their representation of MarcellX in connection with the PSA, but by another firm,” the complaint said. “And Prime Energy had to pay MarcellX an additional $400,000 deposit and did not receive any credit toward the purchase with the $678,800 fraudulently misappropriated by defendants and Thompson.”
In May 2016, Shiner, of Tucker Arensberg, sent a letter to Prime Energy acknowledging that he did not represent MarcellX, the complaint said.
Thompson has been a defendant in at least two other cases related to the Swamp Angel Property, one of which resulted in a $2 million judgment against Thompson. Prime Energy alleged that Tucker Arensberg also failed to disclose those civil actions, as well as a series of violations charged by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Tucker Arensberg filed a motion to dismiss the claims, but U.S. District Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen Kelly of the Western District of Pennsylvania denied that motion in July, allowing the suit to move forward. She said Prime Energy sufficiently alleged that Shiner and Carroll made fraudulent misrepresentations, and “that Shiner directly received a pecuniary benefit from the transaction.”
New York lawyer Charles Manuel Jr., who is representing Prime Energy, declined to comment on the case.
James Schadel of Burns White, who is representing Tucker Arensberg, Shiner and Carroll, did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250