Superior Court Rejects Efforts to Toss $2.5M Risperdal Verdict
The ruling also sent the case back for the trial court to consider whether the plaintiffs should be able to proceed with punitive damages claims.
October 31, 2018 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has upheld the $2.5 million verdict that was awarded in the first case to go to trial from Philadelphia's Risperdal mass tort program.
A unanimous three-judge panel on Wednesday rejected drugmaker Janssen Pharmaceuticals' efforts to overturn the verdict in Pledger v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, which a Philadelphia jury handed up more than three years ago. The ruling also sent the case back for the trial court to consider whether the plaintiffs should be able to proceed with punitive damages claims.
As part of its effort to overturn the verdict, Janssen focused much of its arguments on the plaintiff's experts, specifically contending that the lower court should have granted a mistrial after the plaintiffs sought to change experts midtrial.
According to Superior Court Judge Eugene Strassburger, who wrote the panel's 39-page opinion, the plaintiff's first expert, a pediatrician and endocrinologist from Missouri, had examined the plaintiff, Austin Pledger, in Alabama, and plaintiffs' counsel initially sought to introduce the doctor's testimony through a videotaped deposition. However, Janssen contended that, since the doctor was not licensed in Alabama, his examination of Pledger violated Alabama law. After Janssen's motion, the doctor told the plaintiffs he was no longer willing to testify, so the plaintiffs had another doctor—the doctor who later testified at trial—examine Pledger.
Although Janssen called for a mistrial based on the switch, the trial judge rejected the drugmaker's arguments, saying its accusation about the doctor was “extraordinary and seemed calculated for maximum surprise.”
Strassbuger agreed.
“Moreover, we conclude the relief granted by the trial court was appropriate under the circumstances,” Strassburger said.
After a month-long trial, the jury in Pledger found that Janssen failed to warn of the potential for Risperdal to cause gynecomastia, a condition in which males grow enlarged breasts. Pledger, a 20-year-old from Alabama, took Risperdal, which is an antipsychotic, to assist with behavioral symptoms related to autism. He claimed the drug caused him to grow large breasts, beginning when he was 8 years old, and that—barring a mastectomy—the condition is permanent.
Kline & Specter attorneys Thomas Kline and Charles “Chip” Becker, who are representing Pledger, said in an emailed statement they were pleased with the ruling.
“This litigation has unquestionably turned strongly in the plaintiffs' favor with many additional listings ahead, including two trials devoted solely to punitive damages,” they said.
A spokeswoman for Janssen said, “We are disappointed in the court's ruling and will consider our options going forward.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigating the Written Word: Parol Evidence Rule and the Gist of the Action Doctrine in Fraud Claims
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250