Former Blank Rome Staffer Sues for Gender, Age Discrimination
The former technology director says she was fired after making several complaints about alleged gender bias.
November 02, 2018 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
After a leadership change in its technology department last year, Blank Rome is facing allegations of gender discrimination and age discrimination.
Marion Letterie, Blank Rome's former director of telecommunications, sued the firm and its former chief information officer, Laurence Liss, on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. She alleges that she was fired because of her complaints of gender bias in the firm's technology department, and because of her age.
Blank Rome has said Letterie's claims are meritless.
Liss announced his retirement from the firm last year, when Andrea Markstrom was hired as Blank Rome's new CIO. He stayed on as CIO emeritus for several months to ease the transition, but officially left the firm in February of this year, according to his LinkedIn profile.
Letterie worked in the firm's Philadelphia office for more than three decades, starting out as a secretary's assistant in December 1983, her complaint said. She worked her way up to the director position, but she was dismissed from the firm in September 2017.
During her employment, Letterie alleged, she was paid a lower salary and bonus than men in similar positions. She alleged that in 2008, when her pay dipped by at least $10,000 due to market conditions, male staff at the director level did not suffer similar reductions in pay.
Letterie alleged that Blank Rome and Liss gave her performance feedback colored by gender biases, assigned her clerical duties that were outside the scope of her job as a technology department employee, and expected her to do the paperwork of other technology employees.
The complaint also alleged that Liss repeatedly denied Letterie's requests for additional resources or training, and excluded her from network operations meetings. When she requested to be involved in the network group so she could better manage the firm's transition to voice over internet protocol (VoIP) technology, the complaint said, she was told she “was 'aspiring above her station.'”
Beginning in 2004, the complaint said, Letterie made complaints to the firm about these alleged instances of bias, including a formal complaint in 2016 alleging gender-based pay disparities. She alleged that none of these complaints was investigated by the firm.
In April 2017, Letterie filed an external complaint for the first time, with the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations.
After Markstrom was hired, Letterie received a 3.5 percent raise and a $15,000 bonus, which she alleged in her complaint was not sufficient given her work the previous year on transitioning the firm to a VoIP system. She alleged that Liss continued to influence decisions on her pay after Markstrom joined the firm.
In August 2017, Letterie was notified that her employment would be terminated the following month “as part of a purported 'reduction of force' within the technology department,” the complaint said.
At the time, she noted, she was the oldest non-administrative employee in the technology department, at 63 years old. She alleged that her firing was motivated by her gender discrimination complaints and her age.
Letterie is seeking reinstatement to her position at Blank Rome, as well as lost compensation and other damages. Julie Uebler of Greenblatt, Pierce, Funt & Flores is representing her.
In a statement Friday, a spokeswoman for Blank Rome said: “The firm has thoroughly investigated the allegations of this complaint. They are meritless, and will be vigorously contested.”
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute read'Recover, Reflect, Retool and Retry': Lessons From Women Atop Pa. Legal Community
3 minute readEDPA's New Chief Judge Plans to Advance Efforts to Combat Threats to Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250