Widow of Philadelphia Magazine Publisher Says She Was Stiffed on Husband's Death Benefits
Carol Lipson claims that her husband's publishing company, Metro Corp., has failed to pay her a $1 million benefit, in breach of a 1997 agreement he signed calling for the company to pay her that sum on his death. In addition, a 1997 prenuptial agreement between the Lipsons calls for his estate to pay her another $600,000 on his death, but the estate has refused, her suit claims.
November 05, 2018 at 04:55 PM
3 minute read
Boston and Philadelphia magazine covers. Courtesy photo
The widow of Philadelphia and Boston magazine publisher D. Herbert Lipson claims in a suit that her husband's children from a previous marriage have wrongly withheld $1.6 million in death benefits owed to her.
Carol Lipson claims in a suit that her husband's publishing company, Metro Corp., has failed to pay her a $1 million benefit. In June 1997 Herbert Lipson signed the agreement calling for the corporation to pay her that sum on his death, and to pay for her health insurance, but the company has refused to do so, the suit claims.
The same agreement calls for the company to pay Herbert Lipson's longtime executive assistant, Irene Mueller, $25,000, an obligation the company has honored, the suit claims.
In addition, a 1997 prenuptial agreement between the Lipsons calls for his estate to pay her another $600,000 on his death, but the estate has refused, her suit claims.
D. Herbert Lipson died at age 88 in December 2017. His company published Boston Magazine in addition to Philadelphia Magazine. From 1984 to 1990 the company also published a business magazine, Manhattan Inc.
Carol Lipson, who lives in Margate, filed the suit in Atlantic County Superior Court on Oct. 3. The defendants are Metro Corp. Holdings Inc., the estate of D. Herbert Lipson, former Dechert chairman Barton Winokur, and David Lipson, Sherry Litwer and Debra Claremon, the son and daughters of D. Herbert Lipson.
Winokur and D. Herbert Lipson's three children are the co-executors of his estate. The three Lipson children also control Metro Corp., the suit claims.
The suit brings claims of breach of contract and, in the alternative, unjust enrichment, against Metro Corp. and the estate; and claims of breach of fiduciary duty against the co-executors.
Lawyers for Metro Corp. removed the suit to federal court in Camden on Nov. 2. Metro Corp. says in its notice of removal that New Jersey is the proper venue. But those claims were fraudulently misjoined with the claim against Metro Corp., the company says in court papers. Metro Corp. is not subject to personal jurisdiction in New Jersey with respect to the breach of Herbert Lipson's death benefit agreement, the company says.
Metro Corp. intends to file a motion to dismiss, it said in its notice of removal. The death benefit contract is between a business headquartered in Philadelphia and its officers, who worked in Philadelphia. Therefore, any suit related to the Metro Corp. death benefit must be brought in Pennsylvania, not New Jersey, the company said in its notice of removal.
Kerri Chewning of Archer & Greiner in Haddonfield, who represents Metro Corp., declined to comment on the case. The company is also represented by Frank Trapani of Kreher & Trapani in Philadelphia. David Braverman of Braverman Kaskey in Philadelphia, who represents Carol Lipson, also declined to comment, as did Winokur of Dechert.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
4 minute read
Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute read
Who Got the Work: Morgan Lewis Set to Defend X Corp., Elon Musk in ERISA Suit
Federal Judge Sides With Lyft Driver in Contractual Dispute Over $1M Uninsured Motorist Coverage
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arguing Class Actions: With Friends Like These...
- 2How Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
- 3Fried Frank Partner Leaves for Paul Hastings to Start Tech Transactions Practice
- 4Stradley Ronon Welcomes Insurance Team From Mintz
- 5Weil Adds Acting Director of SEC Enforcement, Continuing Government Hiring Streak
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
