Boston and Philadelphia magazine covers. Courtesy photoWidow of Philadelphia Magazine Publisher Says She Was Stiffed on Husband's Death Benefits
Carol Lipson claims that her husband's publishing company, Metro Corp., has failed to pay her a $1 million benefit, in breach of a 1997 agreement he signed calling for the company to pay her that sum on his death. In addition, a 1997 prenuptial agreement between the Lipsons calls for his estate to pay her another $600,000 on his death, but the estate has refused, her suit claims.
November 05, 2018 at 04:55 PM
3 minute read
The widow of Philadelphia and Boston magazine publisher D. Herbert Lipson claims in a suit that her husband's children from a previous marriage have wrongly withheld $1.6 million in death benefits owed to her.
Carol Lipson claims in a suit that her husband's publishing company, Metro Corp., has failed to pay her a $1 million benefit. In June 1997 Herbert Lipson signed the agreement calling for the corporation to pay her that sum on his death, and to pay for her health insurance, but the company has refused to do so, the suit claims.
The same agreement calls for the company to pay Herbert Lipson's longtime executive assistant, Irene Mueller, $25,000, an obligation the company has honored, the suit claims.
In addition, a 1997 prenuptial agreement between the Lipsons calls for his estate to pay her another $600,000 on his death, but the estate has refused, her suit claims.
D. Herbert Lipson died at age 88 in December 2017. His company published Boston Magazine in addition to Philadelphia Magazine. From 1984 to 1990 the company also published a business magazine, Manhattan Inc.
Carol Lipson, who lives in Margate, filed the suit in Atlantic County Superior Court on Oct. 3. The defendants are Metro Corp. Holdings Inc., the estate of D. Herbert Lipson, former Dechert chairman Barton Winokur, and David Lipson, Sherry Litwer and Debra Claremon, the son and daughters of D. Herbert Lipson.
Winokur and D. Herbert Lipson's three children are the co-executors of his estate. The three Lipson children also control Metro Corp., the suit claims.
The suit brings claims of breach of contract and, in the alternative, unjust enrichment, against Metro Corp. and the estate; and claims of breach of fiduciary duty against the co-executors.
Lawyers for Metro Corp. removed the suit to federal court in Camden on Nov. 2. Metro Corp. says in its notice of removal that New Jersey is the proper venue. But those claims were fraudulently misjoined with the claim against Metro Corp., the company says in court papers. Metro Corp. is not subject to personal jurisdiction in New Jersey with respect to the breach of Herbert Lipson's death benefit agreement, the company says.
Metro Corp. intends to file a motion to dismiss, it said in its notice of removal. The death benefit contract is between a business headquartered in Philadelphia and its officers, who worked in Philadelphia. Therefore, any suit related to the Metro Corp. death benefit must be brought in Pennsylvania, not New Jersey, the company said in its notice of removal.
Kerri Chewning of Archer & Greiner in Haddonfield, who represents Metro Corp., declined to comment on the case. The company is also represented by Frank Trapani of Kreher & Trapani in Philadelphia. David Braverman of Braverman Kaskey in Philadelphia, who represents Carol Lipson, also declined to comment, as did Winokur of Dechert.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
3 minute read
Who Got the Work: Morgan Lewis Set to Defend X Corp., Elon Musk in ERISA Suit
Federal Judge Sides With Lyft Driver in Contractual Dispute Over $1M Uninsured Motorist Coverage
5 minute read
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
