$16.5M Settlement Reached in Traumatic Brain Injury Case
A lawsuit stemming from an incident in which a man sustained a traumatic brain injury after being hit by a vehicle on I-95 has been settled for nearly $16.5 million.
November 07, 2018 at 03:48 PM
3 minute read
A lawsuit stemming from an incident in which a man sustained a traumatic brain injury after being hit by a vehicle on I-95 has been settled for nearly $16.5 million.
In May 2015, plaintiff Hoang Le pulled over on the shoulder of the highway after a diesel fuel tank fell from the bottom of a truck and spilled fuel across the road. According to the plaintiff's pretrial memorandum, an oncoming vehicle lost control after hitting the fuel slick and struck Le.
The defendants in the case were TM Kovacevich International—a produce wholesaler—and Weldone Trailer Repair.
According to the settlement agreement, the $16.5 million settlement was broken down into $15.5 million to be paid by the insurance companies for TMK and $950,000 to be paid by the insurance company for Weldone. The driver who struck Le had previously tendered the policy limit of his insurance policy.
Court papers said that Le required multiple surgeries and therapies, with doctors declaring him disabled in terms of employment and not medically cleared for driving.
Additionally, eight days prior to the accident, Le and his wife Kim Cong had married. However, as a result of the accident, Le suffers from amnesia and no longer recognizes his wife.
Le's attorney, Brian Chacker of Gay & Chacker in Philadelphia, said, “The Les experienced a tragedy that no family should be forced to endure.”
He continued, “We are honored to have had the opportunity to give them some sense of security and well-being for their future.”
The plaintiff alleged that the straps holding the fuel tank in place on the truck failed, claiming that TMK was responsible for making sure all trucks were in safe driving condition and that Welldone was responsible for performing repairs and inspections.
In its court papers, TMK pointed the finger at Weldone.
“Weldone, only five days before the accident, made no comments or suggestions regarding straps or brackets of the fuel tank of the refrigerated trailer,” TMK's pretrial memorandum said. “It is Weldone that has the extra level of expertise. TMK, even with inspection afterwards, relied upon Weldone's representations of no need to do any additional repairs, particularly for the fuel tank or brackets which they had sold and installed only 14 months before.”
Weldone, in its pretrial memorandum, maintained that the fuel tank mounting system on the truck was in good condition when it was inspected.
“Ultimately, TMK held the responsibility of ensuring that the subject tractor-trailer was in a safe condition while on the road,” court papers said.
Welldone's attorney, Francis Deasey of Deasey, Mahoney & Valentini, declined to comment.
TMK's attorney, Stephen Ledva of Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers, did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readHigh Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute readJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250