Corporations Warn Trump Not to Rescind Transgender Rights
The letter condemns the Trump administration's attempts to strip federal protections and rights from the transgender and intersex communities.
November 12, 2018 at 01:45 PM
7 minute read
Corporate America is rejecting President Donald Trump's transphobia. A coalition of America's biggest companies, including Google, Amazon, Nike, Microsoft, Apple, Coke and Pepsi, are coming out against Trump's insidious efforts to erase transgender, gender nonbinary and intersex people from existence, and have written a letter.
It's a bold and necessary move, especially when the money is often the only thing some politicians will listen to. These companies, like JPMorgan Chase, Marriott International, Twitter and the Dow Chemical Co., employ nearly 4.8 million people and generate in excess of $2.4 trillion in annual revenue.
The letter condemns the Trump administration's attempts to strip federal protections and rights from the transgender and intersex communities. These efforts, starting just over one month after Trump was sworn in, include withdrawing landmark 2016 guidance for how schools must protect transgender students under Title IX federal law, removing Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations designed to protect transgender patients in the Affordable Care Act's nondiscrimination provisions, attempting to ban transgender service members of the military, instructing the CDC to remove “transgender” and “diversity” from official documents, and opening a Conscience and Religious Freedom Division within the HHS for the express purpose of giving medical providers with religious objections to treating transgender patients the right to discriminate.
The Trump administration's latest assault, a memo from the HHS department redefining of sex as “male or female, unchangeable, and determined by the genitals that a person is born with,” is the most blatant attempt to erase the existence of an entire community of people. The memo goes on to say questions of gender would be answered with genetic testing. This definition is not based in science, completely ignoring those born with chromosomal combinations different than XX or XY and doesn't account for the thousands born with genital and reproductive organ differences, such as babies born with a uterus and testicles or a penis and ovaries.
The letter, joined by 56 major U.S. corporations, unequivocally supports the millions of people in America who identify as transgender, gender nonbinary or intersex. The letter goes on to remind the Trump administration that dozens of federal courts have affirmed the rights of transgender people, thanks to the growing body of scientific evidence that forcing people into a binary gender definition is not reflective of the complexities of human genetics. It also states that diversity is good for business, reminding this administration that more than 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies have clear gender identity protections written into their policies.
The article states in unequivocal language, “What harms transgender people harms our companies.” This is exactly what the transgender, nonbinary and intersex community needs right now post-midterm elections: a demand to our lawmakers to respect people's right to their own humanity, coming from those that can make politicians listen.
Polls show that 68 percent of Americans would rather purchase from a company that backs LGBTQ equality and the Human Rights Campaign makes companies put their money where they say their values are—with the Corporate Equality Index, which rates companies on their LGBTQ employment policies. In 2018, there were 947 companies surveyed and 609 companies scored a perfect 100 score as “Best Companies to Work for LGBTQ Equality.”
These companies are not purely altruistic actors; promoting equality directly impacts their bottom line. Studies show that progressive leadership and inclusive workplace policies lead to improved recruitment and retention of talented employees, new ideas and innovations generated by drawing on a workforce with a wide range of characteristics and experiences; increased ability to serve a diverse customer base; increased employee productivity and boosting morale and employee relations by responding favorably to requests from employees or unions.
I always say, “if it makes dollars, it makes sense” and equality is the new normal!
The letter in its entirety reads:
“We, the undersigned businesses, stand with the millions of people in America who identify as transgender, gender non-binary, or intersex, and call for all such people to be treated with the respect and dignity everyone deserves.
We oppose any administrative and legislative efforts to erase transgender protections through reinterpretation of existing laws and regulations. We also fundamentally oppose any policy or regulation that violates the privacy rights of those that identify as transgender, gender non-binary, or intersex.
In the last two decades, dozens of federal courts have affirmed the rights and identities of transgender people. Cognizant of growing medical and scientific consensus, courts have recognized that policies that force people into a binary gender definition determined by birth anatomy fail to reflect the complex realities of gender identity and human biology.
Recognizing that diversity and inclusion are good for business, and that discrimination imposes enormous productivity costs (and exerts undue burdens), hundreds of companies, including the undersigned, have continued to expand inclusion for transgender people across corporate America. Currently more than 80 percent of the Fortune 500 have clear gender identity protections; two-thirds have transgender-inclusive healthcare coverage; hundreds have LGBTQ+ and Allies business resource groups and internal training efforts.
Transgender people are our beloved family members and friends, and our valued team members. What harms transgender people harms our companies.
We call for respect and transparency in policy-making, and for equality under the law for transgender people.”
Accenture
Adobe Systems Inc.
Airbnb
Altria Group
Amalgamated Bank
Amazon
American Airlines
Apple
Automatic Data Processing Inc. (ADP)
Bank of America
Ben & Jerry's Homemade
BNY Mellon
Cargill
Cisco Systems Inc.
Citi
Clifford Chance
Corning Inc.
Corteva Agriscience, the Agriculture Division of DowDuPont
Deutsche Bank
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co.
Fastly, Inc.
Hogan Lovells International
HSBC
IBM Corp.
Intel Corp.
Intuit Inc.
Iron Mountain
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Levi Strauss & Co.
Lush Handmade Cosmetics
Lyft
Marriott International
MassMutual
MGM Resorts International
Microsoft Corp.
Nike Inc.
PepsiCo
Replacements Ltd.
Ropes & Gray
Royal Bank of Canada
S&P Global
Salesforce
Sheppard Mullin
Sodexo Inc.
Splunk
State Street Corp.
The Coca-Cola Co.
The Dow Chemical Co.
TiVo Corp.
Trillium Asset Management
Twitter Inc.
Uber
Warby Parker
Angela D. Giampolo, principal of Giampolo Law Group, maintains offices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey and specializes in LGBT law, business law, real estate law and civil rights. Her website is www.giampololaw.com and she maintains two blogs, www.phillygaylawyer.com and www.lifeinhouse.com. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElectronic Travel Authorization for Visa-Exempt Travelers to the US, UK and Europe
Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Election Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
- 2The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
- 3Why Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
- 4The Whys and Hows of a Mediator’s Proposal
- 5Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250