Construction Worker Awarded $24.1M in Brain Injury Fall
Three companies have agreed to pay a total of $24.1 million to settle claims brought by the family of a man who was rendered “infant-like” after a debilitating brain injury he suffered during the construction of the Conshohocken Rowing Center.
November 15, 2018 at 04:07 PM
5 minute read
Oates v. Malvern Preparatory School
$24.1M Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 7.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 01795,
Judge: Denis Cohen.
Type of Action: Personal injury.
Injuries: Brain injury.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Andrew Duffy, Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky, Philadelphia; L. Leonard Lundy, Lundy Law, Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Experts: Steven Estrin; construction expert; Richard Hislop, safety expert; Guy Fried, rehabilitation expert; Ramon R. Diaz-Arrastia, neurology expert; Kimberly Kushner, lifecare planner; Steven Gumerman, vocational analyst; Andrew Verzilli, expert economist; Grant Liu, expert neuro-ophthalmologist; Samuel Romirowsky, psychologist, for Kenyatta Oates; Michael McCabe, a toxicology expert.
Defense Counsel: Catherine Walto, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia; William Catto, Litchfield Cavo; Matthew Glazer, Cozen O'Connor.
Defense Experts: Chad Staller, forensic economist; Michael Smychynsky, vocational expert; Robert Shavelle, life expectancy expert; Chava Goldschmidt, lifecare planner; Richard Bennett, neurologist; Wendell Rust, safety expert; Sam Gualardi, liability expert.
Comment:
Three companies have agreed to pay a total of $24.1 million to settle claims brought by the family of a man who was rendered “infant-like” after a debilitating brain injury he suffered during the construction of the Conshohocken Rowing Center.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Pa. High Court to Weigh Parent Company's Liability for Dissolved Subsidiary's Conduct
3 minute read
Don’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute read
Matt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
2 minute read
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 2'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
- 311 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
- 4In-House Moves of Month: Discover Fills Awkward CLO Opening, Allegion GC Lasts Just 3 Months
- 5Delaware Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
