Measuring, Meeting and Succeeding at Employee Engagement
I recently moderated a panel for the Philadelphia Chapter of Association of Legal Administrators on how employers can measure, meet and succeed when it comes to employee engagement. The panel was engaging (pun intended) and full of information on why, as employers, we can't seem to stop talking about employee satisfaction and engagement.
November 15, 2018 at 04:07 PM
7 minute read
I recently moderated a panel for the Philadelphia Chapter of Association of Legal Administrators on how employers can measure, meet and succeed when it comes to employee engagement. The panel was engaging (pun intended) and full of information on why, as employers, we can't seem to stop talking about employee satisfaction and engagement. These conversations are only going to continue as study after study shows that employee engagement is directly correlated not only to job satisfaction but also to employee turnover. While there are many industries that have taken and ran with employee engagement initiatives, it appears (as it is in other areas too like diversity and inclusion) the legal industry still lags behind. It appears that there remains a disconnect between what an employee wants and needs from their employer and what the employer is actually willing to give the employee in return. I followed up recently with Natalie Loeb, founder and lead consultant of Loeb Leadership Development Group, and who previously defined employee engagement in my recent article on the value of workplace wellness programs. Loeb said that when beginning employee engagement programs with her law firm clients, she always begins by stating, “If a firm chooses not to focus on building a culture, it will build one on its own. And is that the culture the firm aspires to?” Building a culture has everything to do with engaging employees and therefore, as Loeb always asks, are you prepared for your (in)actions to communicate the message that is received by employees on the value you see them bringing to the table? Below you will find (easy to follow) information on ways that you can measure, meet and succeed at the engagement of your employees.
However, before you go ahead and start trying a variety of new ways to promote (or improve) employee engagement, it would make sense to first understand what your baseline statistics are within your firm. Understanding the range and level of existing employee engagement is critical. Law firms employ a wide range of employees who perform a variety of tasks that range from entry level positions to employees who perform highly complex and sophisticated tasks for the firm and its clients. Given employee diversity in experience and responsibility, an internal survey is a great way to start. Mary Robinson, director of human resources at Duane Morris, says the first step to improving something is to measure it. She stated that her firm “believes that by administering an annual administrative satisfaction survey that measures results against previous years, as well as taking 'actionable insights,' firm management is able to show partners and employees that the firm genuinely cares about them. When people know you care, they respond with an increased loyalty and commitment to the organization.” Robinson went on to talk about specific examples from her firm's recent survey: “For example we asked, based on a one to five scale, that partners and employees rate statements for human resources staff administration such as 'overall administrative support for staff personnel in the areas of compensation, performance evaluation, personnel counseling, job posting, new hire orientation and special projects.'” Duane Morris has seen incremental increases in its scores since the firm started measuring in 2005. Robinson stated they receive a great deal of positive feedback but the “areas for improvement” is the most interesting input because it allows the firm to make adjustments to policies and procedures where feasible. This year her department had an overall score of 4.37 but they always “strive for five.”
Once you have a good understanding as to where the baseline level of existing engagement (or lack thereof) stands within your firm, the next thing you need to address is meeting (and hopefully eventually exceeding) employee engagement expectations. Studies have shown that while over 75 percent of employers are willing to engage employees with certain in-demand benefits such health insurance and paid time off, less than one quarter of employers are likely to provide other benefits such as flexible work schedules and remote working opportunities. By failing to give employees the things they need you run the risk of disengaging them which ultimately results in higher turnover rates. Employers who value employee engagement create a wellness program, remove the facetime requirement and support remote workers, and encourage all employees' professional development, just to name a few.
But another interesting approach to employee engagement is using your office space and its design to bolster an employee's engagement. When our firm relocated its Philadelphia office in May 2018 we did so with the goal of finding a new space that continued to meet client expectations but that also allowed our team to work more cohesively. Because many of our team prefer to work remotely at least a part of their workweek, we were able to reduce our office real estate footprint by almost half (and reduce overhead significantly). Our new design concept allows not only for a greater collaborative working environment but it also simultaneously gives our employees the benefit of working remotely. Similarly, earlier this year intellectual property boutique firm Panitch Schwarze started office hoteling for its associates and patent agents where work spaces are reserved rather than each employee having a permanent desk. They are also required to work from home a certain number of days a week, which resulted in the firm “slashing facilities costs by about 40 percent, a huge cost savings that ultimately benefits their clients through improved value and efficiency.”
Donna McDaniel, lead interior designer at Formcraft, noted that today's workplace design strategies are most certainly evolving. McDaniel explained, “Activity-based design solutions comprised of a variety of settings to support specific work tasks are moving toward a more holistic approach that focuses on the user experience and their daily journey. The main drivers for this design shift are the desire for improved employee wellness and engagement, continued advancement in technology and mobility, and attracting and retaining a diverse and multi-generational group of talent.” McDaniel went on to talk about a recent experience where her client “decided to push their boundaries to foster more collaboration and engagement in their new space. The goal was to break down the firm's workplace silos that their previous space had enabled. The team created an expansive multi-functional common space with a variety of meeting, lounge, pantry and gaming functions. Not only has the space been highly utilized for various activities, but the smaller glass front huddle rooms facing this energizing space are found to be in high demand. They are the first hoteling rooms booked by the traveling leadership. It has proven to be a very engaging space indeed.”
Whether you are looking for short-term engagement initiatives like conducting internal surveys to improve specific areas or are looking for more long-term initiatives including a new office space that is designed for a more collaborative work environment, employee engagement should begin to rise. Don't expect happy employees overnight but know that as long as your employees feel like you care about them you should see results in improved employee productivity and higher retention rates—a win-win situation for both sides.
Jessica L. Mazzeo is a co-founder and chief operating officer of Griesing Law, a full service business law firm headquartered in Philadelphia. Mazzeo focuses on overseeing and implementing all of the firm's business operations while establishing policies that promote and retain the firm's culture and strategic vision. She is also the co-founder of Bossible, a company that focuses on business and professional development for individuals and small businesses. Mazzeo is also currently pursuing her law degree at Widener University Delaware School of Law. Contact her at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readDon’t Settle for the Minimum: Finding Constitutional Claims Closer to Home
7 minute readLaw Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
Trending Stories
- 1Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs: Week of Nov. 24
- 2Justices Appear Leery to Letting Holocaust-Related Claims Against Hungary in U.S. Courts
- 3Judge Rejects New Trial for Tom Girardi, Whose Testimony Was 'Consistent With the Defense Case'
- 4New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 5The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250