Phila. Public Defenders, Lancaster Co. Foster Parents Hit With $4.5M Judgment in Child Abuse Case
For a period of three-and-a-half years, the children were taken to the basement of the Lancaster County home in which they lived, were told to lie down on a freezer, and were beaten by hand or with objects, according to court papers.
November 26, 2018 at 02:52 PM
4 minute read
The Defender Association of Philadelphia, a foster care agency and two Lancaster County foster parents have been found liable for the abuse of a twin brother and sister, a case resulting in a $4.5 million jury verdict in favor of the children.
For a period of three-and-a-half years, the children were taken to the basement of the Lancaster County home in which they lived, were told to lie down on a freezer, and were beaten by hand or with objects, according to court papers.
After a nearly two-week trial, the Philadelphia jury late Nov. 21 found the Defender Association 55 percent liable in the case; Bethanna, the foster agency, 20 percent liable; Wayne Keeny, the foster father, 20 percent liable; and foster mother Rosella Keeny 5 percent liable for child abuse.
The children, now both 8 years old, were removed from their mother's home in Philadelphia because she could no longer care for them. However, their biological father learned of their whereabouts and sought reunification. They are now in his care.
After learning of the beatings, the biological father filed a lawsuit alleging that the child advocacy unit of the Defender Association, which represented the children in court, failed to act after discovering the abuse. The lawsuit, handled by Kline & Specter attorneys Nadeem Bezar and Emily Marks, also alleged Bethanna failed to properly vet the Keenys as foster parents.
Bethanna is a Community Umbrella Agency, or CUA, which is often used by the Philadelphia Department of Human Services for placing children in foster homes. A recent Legal Intelligencer article detailed how CUAs, through providing inadequate services, have endangered children.
“As a general rule when we fail to monitor our kids carefully and we fail to treat them like individuals and understand what they are experiencing, bad things are going to happen,” Bezar said.
Bezar added that moving into a foster home is traumatic for children and that if they are far from biological family members, they are less likely to complain of abuse—especially if it means being moved again.
“Having to put all your belongings into a green garbage bag thrown into the back of a case manager's car as you're transported elsewhere is so traumatic for the kid that they'll just take the abuse and they won't complain. It's horrible,” Bezar said.
The Defender Association did not return a call seeking comment for this article.
In court papers the Defender Association said it “acted at all times within the applicable standards of professional care, and the defendants deny all liability for the minor plaintiffs' alleged injuries and damages. There were multiple social workers from multiple organizations, in addition to physicians and other adults who had seen and interacted with the minor plaintiffs during their time in the Keeny home, and there was never any corroboration of any of the issues raised by” the biological father.
Bethanna's attorney, William Banton of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, said the agency entered into a settlement prior to the verdict. In court papers, Bethanna denied any negligence and said that the biological father's complaints were always investigated by the agency and were determined to be unfounded.
The Keenys' attorney, Matthew Menges of Trinity Law, did not return a call seeking comment.
The couple faced criminal charges in 2016, but those charges were ultimately withdrawn.
“Keenys have admitted they used corporal punishment against the twins while in foster care in their home. The use of corporal punishment did not injury [sic] the twins either physically or emotionally,” their court papers said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllImmunity for Mental Health Care and Coverage for CBD: What's on the Pa. High Court's November Calendar
5 minute readSlip-and-Fall Suit Cleared to Proceed Against Kalahari Indoor Waterpark
3 minute readVolunteering for Voter Protection Efforts, Pa. Firms Brace for Contentious Election
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250