Smart Ways to Enhance Client Relationships Via Technology
Like other businesses, relationships are at the core of the legal profession. Clients expect attorneys to be able to draft documents, write briefs, argue motions and manage legal transactions.
December 05, 2018 at 12:23 PM
5 minute read
Like other businesses, relationships are at the core of the legal profession. Clients expect attorneys to be able to draft documents, write briefs, argue motions and manage legal transactions. While these skills are necessary, today's legal profession also requires attorneys (especially more junior attorneys) to forge lasting relationships with clients. In other words, clients are people too and it's important to build and sustain both professional and personal relationships with them even when you are not representing them in an active litigation or transaction.
Ideally, attorneys would find time to meet face-to-face with clients regularly but work, family and scheduling conflicts often prevent repeated face-to-face interaction. As such, attorneys should consider turning to technology to fill some of the gap. Used strategically, technology can amplify your business development potential and show your clients that you are thinking about them and understand their business needs. A word to the wise though: be strategic but don't be creepy! Figure out if a client wants to communicate—or perhaps wants to be left alone—and how the client wants to communicate.
Let's review a few ways you can leverage technology to enhance your client relationships.
Email and Outlook reminders—Use email or Outlook calendar entries to remind you to call a client or send them a short email, especially clients with whom you have not communicated in a while. This is especially important when you are not actively representing the client in litigation or a transaction. Clients get hundreds of emails a day; an email that simply says “hello” or “hope all is well” and does not ask for anything is usually welcome and keeps your name in front of them. Indeed, these kinds of emails often remind a client that they have something on their desk that they need your help with.
Google alerts—Clients expect their attorneys to know their business. Google alerts can make that happen. Google alerts allow you to receive notifications regarding information or articles about a client. For example, a Google alert will send you links to articles about your client's merger or acquisition. In turn, you can use this information to send the client a quick email or make a short call to congratulate them. Further, staying up-to-date on the client and its business will make you appear more like a partner and trusted adviser rather than merely a service provider who handles its legal work. Asking questions like “Will the company's recent sale of its insurance division impact how we want to litigate this case?” shows the client you understand its business and that litigation and transactions are necessarily interconnected with, affect and impact other aspects of its business.
Videoconferencing—Conference calls are expedient, but sometimes a videoconference is more personal and perhaps even necessary. Face-to-face interaction with a client, even if it is by videoconference or Skype, can help you better understand the client and establish a more meaningful connection. There is no substitute for seeing a client's facial expression or reaction to a litigation strategy or a smile when you tell them that a deal officially closed. You can't get that immediate feedback on a conference call!
Thoughtful video notes—Many attorneys send clients articles relevant to their business, but sending videos can be even more meaningful, not to mention a welcome break for the client from reading emails, articles, and documents. Sending a news video that relates to the client's business is a great way to show the client you are thinking about them and their problems and issues. Extra credit for sending a client a video that establishes or strengthens a personal connection. For example, if you and the client both like soccer, you could send them a video of an incredible goal that happened in the match the evening before. Be selective; don't force these kinds of personal connections, but if they exist, utilize them and don't be afraid to foster that connection. Again, clients are people just like you!
In sum, clients, like most people, like to work with people they have a connection with and who understand the problems that the client or its industry faces. In-person interaction is ideal if you can do it, but it's not always possible, so attorneys should use technology to fill the void. Do not discount the value of calling or emailing a client to say “hello” or sending them a video about their business or a mutual interest. These connections are invaluable as they will help you forge connections with your clients that go deeper than just the day-to-day legal matters on which you work.
Adam Roseman is a labor and employment associate and Kelly Dobbs Bunting is a labor and employment shareholder at the Philadelphia office of Greenberg Traurig.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Firms Set to Finish Year Strong, Thanks to Demand Uptick, Shorter Collections Cycle
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250