I am representing an individual charged with murder in the first degree and it appears the death penalty will be sought. The evidence is overwhelming. I want to focus on the penalty phase. The client, who I think is mentally unbalanced, wants me to fight the guilt/innocence phase. What can I ethically do?

The question is very interesting, particularly in view of the recent U.S. Supreme Court case in McCoy v. Louisiana, U.S.-538 Supreme Court 1500 (2018). In McCoy, the Supreme Court reversed the conviction and indicated the defendant had a Sixth Amendment right to insist that his counsel refrain from admitting that the defendant committed the three murders during the guilt/innocence phase of the capital trial. The court made that ruling even though trial counsel believed that by admitting guilt, it gave the defendant his best chance to avoid the death penalty.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]