Partner Pay Grew in Phila., but Not Everyone Is Satisfied
Philadelphia law firm partners reported average compensation of $702,000, the fourth-lowest average among 14 major cities in a new survey.
December 07, 2018 at 03:56 PM
4 minute read
Law firm partners in Philadelphia tend to make less than the average partner industrywide, a new survey shows, and they're less likely to report high satisfaction with that compensation.
Major, Lindsey & Africa released its biennial Partner Compensation Survey last week, conducted in partnership with legal market research specialist Acritas. While a number of Philadelphia partners remain unsatisfied, the survey reflects an increase in average partner compensation in the city.
Philadelphia respondents reported average compensation of $702,000, which was the fourth-lowest average among 14 total major cities surveyed. Still, that number represents a 12 percent increase from the 2016 survey, which found average partner compensation in Philadelphia to be $625,000. (The sampling of respondents, who are from Am Law 200 firms and similarly sized law firms, was not identical from survey to survey, which may have impacted the findings.)
Philadelphia also had the second-lowest partner billing rate, at $618. The only city where the average rate was lower was Minneapolis, at $550. All major cities reported an increase in billing rates, the survey found.
Major Lindsey found that average compensation among all respondents nationwide, including equity partners and nonequity partners, was $885,000, up 1 percent since the last survey in 2016. But billing rates outpaced compensation growth. The average billing rate among all respondents was $718, showing an increase of 5 percent.
Nationally, median compensation, which is less skewed by cities with the highest partner pay, was $575,000. That's lower than the average compensation of all the major cities, but close to the average compensation among partners located outside major cities, which was $569,000.
Among the 14 cities analyzed in the survey, Philadelphia had the lowest percentage of partners reporting that they are “very satisfied” with their compensation. Just 12 percent of partner respondents said they are very satisfied with compensation. The highest proportion of very satisfied partners was in Los Angeles, with 31 percent.
In Philadelphia, 64 percent of respondents said they are satisfied to some extent, marking a decrease from 78 percent in 2016. And 30 percent of respondents said they are dissatisfied to some extent.
The only cities with higher dissatisfaction numbers were Houston and Minneapolis. In 2016, 22 percent of Philadelphia respondents said they were dissatisfied to some extent.
It should be noted that in 2018, compared with 2016, the survey provided more options for respondents to choose from in terms of their satisfaction levels. “Neutral” was an option in this year's survey, which captured 6 percent of Philadelphia respondents. And there were six other options: very satisfied, moderately satisfied, slightly satisfied, slightly dissatisfied, moderately dissatisfied and very dissatisfied.
The survey also asked about originations, noting the strong connection between originations and total partner compensation. Average originations increased among Philadelphia partners from 2016 to 2018, reaching $2.19 million. That fell below the average of $2.57 million, which was boosted by high numbers in New York and Dallas, but Philadelphia landed well above the median for originations, which was $1.25 million.
Of the 1,383 total respondents that answered Major Lindsey's survey, 52 were from Philadelphia, representing 4 percent of the total sample. Total respondents and Philadelphia respondents were greater in number in 2016, with over 1,600 total and 82 Philadelphia respondents that year.
The full survey took a closer look this year at the gender pay gap, dedicating a focused set of questions to that issue for the first time. And the survey found a gap of 53 percent between male and female partner pay.
While that is a greater number than the survey has found in previous years, study author Jeffrey Lowe, global practice leader of Major Lindsey's law firm practice, cautioned against concluding that the trend is worsening, noting that the 1,400 to 2,000 partners who have responded in the five previous surveys are not fixed.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $1.15M Settlement, Reduces Attorney Award in COVID-19 Tuition Reimbursement Suit
4 minute readPennsylvania Modernizes Trust Administration With New Directed Trust Statute
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250