3rd Circuit: Worker's Firing for Damaging Laptop Not Pretext for Disability Discrimination
A former employee at a battery manufacturing plant who was fired for allegedly damaging a company laptop could not establish a causal connection between his termination and a disabling injury he suffered at work years earlier.
December 11, 2018 at 03:58 PM
3 minute read
A former employee at a battery manufacturing plant who was fired for allegedly damaging a company laptop could not establish a causal connection between his termination and a disabling injury he suffered at work years earlier.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Tuesday affirmed the lower court's summary judgment order in Bruce Frymoyer's case against East Penn Manufacturing Co.
In May 2012, Frymoyer, a maintenance mechanic, injured his left knee at work. He underwent surgery, was on disability leave for six to eight months, and was approved for workers' compensation with the assistance of his employer, according to Third Circuit Judge Kent Jordan's opinion.
In 2013, Frymoyer began experiencing knee pain and sought workers' compensation again. He was denied, and hired a lawyer to pursue the claim. In 2014, he had a second surgery and was out of work for several months, but was restored to his position with the same pay when he returned.
Frymoyer claimed that even though he was restored to his position, he was disciplined for taking time off to recover from his second surgery, Jordan said. Later, Frymoyer was accused of throwing an object at a company laptop, damaging it. He denied the account, but was subsequently fired.
After Frymoyer filed suit, the court concluded that no reasonable jury would find a link between his firing and the injury.
On appeal, Frymoyer argued that East Penn did not argue the nonexistence of a causal link between his firing and either his disability or his workers' compensation claim.
However, Jordan said, “It is true that East Penn's argument in the district court was not captured in a standalone section of a brief labeled 'causal link.' The briefing does, however, plainly state that the 'plaintiff cannot establish a causal connection … which is a required element … of wrongful termination.'”
He added, “East Penn thus raised the lack of a causal link with respect to both the federal and state law claims.”
Frymoyer also argued the district court set too high a standard for proving a prima facie case and that he presented sufficient evidence to establish a claim that he was fired on the basis of his injury.
“There is no evidence in the record showing that East Penn did not believe that Frymoyer committed the alleged misconduct. East Penn justified Frymoyer's termination based on the written statement of his co-worker identifying him as the employee who wantonly damaged the laptop,” Jordan said.
“In short, East Penn offered a legitimate explanation for the termination and Frymoyer has failed to produce sufficient evidence to raise a factual question regarding whether the reason was pre-textual,” Jordan said. “Summary judgment based on the lack of a causal link was thus appropriate.”
Frymoyer is represented by Fort Washington-based Marc E. Weinstein.
“We congratulate opposing counsel on a job well done. Of course, we are disappointed the 3rd Circuit panel did not share our point of view, but so it goes in litigation,” Weinstein said in an email. “You can't persuade judges that you're correct all the time. But the battle for workplace fairness will continue, waged by my firm and many other fine plaintiffs' employment lawyers.”
East Penn is represented by Andrew N. Howe of the Spruce Law Group, who also did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readChild Welfare Agency, Hotel Agree to $9.4M Settlement With Trafficking Victim
3 minute readFederal Judge Rejects Lyft's 'Competitive Harm' Claims in Attempt to Seal Safety Procedures, Storage Information
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250