Dugan Elected President Judge of Phila. Municipal Court, but Day Is Marred by Racist Missive
Municipal Court Judge Karen Y. Simmons, who was one of three candidates vying for the leadership role, found a racist message in her robing room at the Criminal Justice Center on Tuesday.
December 13, 2018 at 04:38 PM
3 minute read
Philadelphia Judge Patrick Dugan was elected as president judge of the Philadelphia Municipal Court following an election that was marred by a racist, misogynist and threatening letter sent to one of the candidates. Where the letter came from is being investigated by law enforcement.
Dugan was elected Thursday afternoon by his fellow municipal court judges with a total of 18 votes. Municipal Court Judge Charles Hayden received five votes, and Municipal Court Judge Karen Y. Simmons received three votes.
Dugan, a Democrat, was appointed to the bench in 2007, and was elected to a full term in 2009. He also served as chief judge of Philadelphia's Veterans Court. He is replacing current President Judge Marsha Neifield.
Dugan did not immediately return a call for comment on his election victory Thursday evening.
Dugan was recently assigned the high-profile homicide case against Philadelphia Police Officer Ryan Pownall, but stepped aside from that case in September for procedural reasons.
Although elections for the municipal court judge is usually a quiet process, the race was marred by a letter that Simmons, who is black, found Tuesday. The message was found in an envelope for intra-office mail in her robing room at the Criminal Justice Center. The message, according to the Courier Express and The Philadelphia Inquirer, said “THERE WILL NEVER BE A BLACK BITCH RUNNING OUR COURT. YOU WON'T BE PRESIDENT JUDGE!!!” It ended with “KEEP MC COURT GREAT!”
Hayden is also black, and Dugan is white.
There was no word on who might be responsible for the letter and there was no indication that any of the candidates were involved in any way.
Simmons said Thursday afternoon that finding the letter felt like “a sucker punch.”
“It was shock. I never would have thought this would happen to anyone in 2018, and for sure not anyone in Philadelphia in 2018,” she said. “I figured whoever did it, if they thought they were going to sway [the president judge election] then they didn't know me. It was hurtful and disappointing, but I was never going to drop out of this race.”
In a statement to the press, Gabriel Roberts, spokesman for the First Judicial District, said that the court is cooperating with law enforcement as it investigates the incident.
“The court is fully cooperating with this investigation by law enforcement into discovering the individual or individuals behind the egregious racist and hateful comments directed toward one of our judges,” Roberts said. “The offensive and intolerable nature of this document is a violation of everything this court promotes and stands for and it will not be tolerated. The court will take all appropriate action upon the conclusion of this investigation.”
In a tweet, Benjamin Waxman, spokesman for the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, said the office was aware of the “apparent threat” and is working with law enforcement partners to investigate the incident as well.
Luz Cardenas, a spokeswoman with the Philadelphia Sheriff's Office, confirmed that the office is also investigating the incident.
An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified the reason for Dugan reassigning the Pownall case to another judge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1State Law Falls Short on Disability Rights
- 2People in the News—Nov. 26, 2024—Barley Snyder, McNees
- 3Akin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
- 4Walking a Minute in Your Adversary’s Shoes: Addressing the Issue of 'Naive Realism' at Mediation
- 5The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250