2018: When Chaos Came to a Head in Philadelphia Family Court
This year has seen the emergence of several shocking accounts from lawyers and litigants about their experiences in Philadelphia's family court and child welfare system, revealing a troubling trend of institutional secrecy and a lack of oversight.
December 27, 2018 at 04:34 PM
4 minute read
This year has seen the emergence of several shocking accounts from lawyers and litigants about their experiences in Philadelphia's family court and child welfare system, revealing a troubling trend of institutional secrecy and a lack of oversight.
In April, The Legal reported that sophomore Philadelphia Family Court Judge Lyris F. Younge had an extensive history of violating the due process rights of parents who appeared before her—often in cases where parents were at risk of losing their children.
At the time, it was discovered that Younge was the most appealed and overturned judge in family court. The trend continued throughout the year.
In her first upended decision, Younge was called out by a state Superior Court panel for locking a sick mother out of the courtroom after she had left the dependency hearings to vomit. Younge ruled in favor of the city's Department of Human Services arguments against the mother.
“I'm not allowing her to come back in,” Younge said at the March 16, 2016, hearing just days after joining the bench. “So that testimony is out the window because she walked out without permission of the court. Even if she was sick she should have had the courtesy to let me know that. So her disdain for the court has been so noted.”
That move drew a warning from Superior Court Judge Jacqueline Shogan.
“Although the trial court might well have believed that [the Department of Human Services] presented overwhelming evidence against [the] mother, the trial court violated mother's constitutional guarantee to due process when it precluded her from the opportunity to be heard,” Shogan wrote in an opinion.
As time passed, Younge was admonished for wrongly jailing a grandmother and holding a child in foster care to force a confession of alleged abuse from her parents, and was pulled from a case in which she allegedly held a lawyer in contempt without giving him the opportunity to defend himself.
Her behavior sparked protests, and she was later removed from the Family Court bench and reassigned to conduct civil hearings. She has been the subject of a state Judicial Conduct Board ethics probe since May.
|Abuse Claims Emerge From City Foster Care System
Younge also presided over the case of Virginia McKale, who shared the story of her grandson's abuse in foster care.
In McKale's case, her grandchildren were separated after being removed from their mother. Despite McKale's protests that she could house them both in her seven-bedroom home, Younge denied that request because McKale lives across state lines.
McKale alleged that one of her grandsons was later sexually assaulted by another child in a foster home. The Legal reported that McKale's story was one of many accounts of abuse in Philadelphia foster homes and that it was a symptom of a systemic problem that centered on inadequate services provided by Community Umbrella Agencies, or CUAs, which are private entities that DHS contracts with to provide caseworkers in addition to vetting potential foster homes.
CUAs have been sued numerous times over the years for failure to properly vet foster parents who went on to abuse children. Several of those cases have produced multimillion-dollar results.
In November, McKale was silenced by Philadelphia Judge Joseph Fernandes for publicly discussing her grandson's story. The gag order also changed her unsupervised visits with her grandchildren to supervised visits.
In December, Philadelphia City Controller Rebecca Rhynhart confirmed that her office is considering initiating a performance audit of DHS.
Chief among Rhynhart's concerns is how DHS removes children from their parents' homes for poverty-based reasons.
“DHS is a big area of the city's budget and is charged with caring for the children in our city,” Rhynhart said. “The reporting that's been done on the issues about kids who have been taken from their parents unfairly and also some of the abuse children have suffered could be cause for concern and it's something my office is looking into.”
A final decision on whether the Controller's Office will pursue such an audit is to be made in early 2019.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readBosworth Claims It Was Kline & Specter, Not Him, That Breached Settlement Terms
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
- 2How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
- 3Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
- 4The Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
- 5Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250