Is Downward Trend for Post-Conviction Filings Likely to Continue Under Krasner?
According to the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, the number of PCRA cases being filed in Philadelphia has been trending downward since it peaked in 2014 with 2,764 petitions being filed.
January 11, 2019 at 02:11 PM
5 minute read
Early last month, Philadelphia defense attorney Teri Himebaugh, who focuses on post-conviction appeals, emailed more than 20 colleagues, asking if they had any cases involving two homicide detectives who may have engaged in a “pattern and practice” of unconstitutional interrogation techniques that could affect numerous cases in Philadelphia.
The request was not unusual, but according to Himebaugh, the discussions she's been having with the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office have been. Himebaugh said the office, which just finished up its first year under criminal justice reformer Larry Krasner, has been much more receptive to claims alleging patterns of allegedly unconstitutional behavior, and seemingly much more willing to vet those claims.
“I've had more discussions with the DA's Office in the past year than I had in the prior 29 years,” Himebaugh said.
Himebaugh said she has already seen an upswing in work, and she expects the number of post-conviction appeals will likely increase as the office carries out this new approach.
Assistant District Attorney Nancy Winkelman, who is heading the Law Division, which handles all the appeals for the prosecutor's office, agreed.
“With policies of increased transparency and disclosure, we anticipate the number of PCRAs to increase,” she said recently in an emailed response to numerous questions last year.
Numbers provided by the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts, however, provide a somewhat different story, and, according to several attorneys who focus on post-conviction appeals, the reasons for filing PCRA petitions are multifaceted and reach beyond the policy decisions by the prosecutor's office.
According to the office, the number of PCRA cases being filed in Philadelphia has been trending downward since it peaked in 2014 with 2,764 petitions being filed. That number was an increase of nearly 1,000 petitions over the 1,703 that were filed in 2013. According to the AOPC statistics, the number of petitions have slowly dwindled since 2014, with 2,161 being filed in 2015, 2,003 being filed in 2016 and 1,747 being filed in 2017.
As of October, only 1,037 had been filed in 2018, which put the year on par to have the lowest number of petitions filed in the past five years.
Attorneys who spoke with The Legal said that a variety of issues can factor into the number of PCRAs filed each year.
According to attorneys, there is a constant stream of petitions that get filed simply because prisoners are likely to continually challenge their convictions, however, outside events, such as media reports of police misconduct, judges' practices seen as problematic, or findings of misconduct by the police Internal Affairs Division typically trigger waves of new filings.
Bradley Bridge of the Defender Association of Philadelphia, who has been handling appeals involving allegedly corrupt police officers since 1995, said the 2014 spike was likely linked to the 2014 arrest of six officers from the Narcotics Field Unit on charges related to allegations that they falsified police reports; stole cash, drugs and personal property; and brutalized suspects.
Bridge, in an interview over the summer, said he filed notices raising post-conviction appeal issues in 1,400 cases stemming from those arrests. Bridge also noted that, soon after the controversy involving rapper Meek Mill came to light, raising credibility questions about a former Philadelphia police officer, his office filed about 300 post-conviction appeals citing the newly discovered allegations.
Bridge said he does not expect any changes from the Krasner administration will change how his office decides whether to file an appeal.
“I don't know whether people out there in the world will think differently of how Larry Krasner will review them or not, but it doesn't change it for me,” Bridge said.
Defense lawyer Barnaby Wittels also cited the recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions striking down life sentences for juveniles as likewise providing a steady stream of additional appeals to the system.
Defense attorney Rania Major-Trunfio said during an interview over the summer that, in the long term, she expects PCRA filings will decline, since, according to her and several other defense attorneys who've spoken with The Legal, the DA's Office has been offering lighter prison sentences and more diversionary programs.
“I think it's going to stay low, if not get lower,” Major-Trunfio said. “If you take a look at the cases in court this year, we are getting fairer offers out of the DA's office, and if there are fairer trials and more pleas, there will be less appeals and fewer PCRAs.”
Major-Trunfio, however, added there is a chance the filings will increase in the short-term, as some prisoners and attorneys might view the filing of a PCRA as a means to essentially re-open sentencing negotiations in cases that might have been problematic.
“They're much more willing to listen,” Major-Trunfio said. “They're looking at it from both sides.”
In answering questions over email, Winkelman, who took over heading the Law Division in January 2018, said she did not have any specific data comparing the Krasner administration's approach versus prior administrations. The main difference, she said, is that the Law Division is functioning more as a single entity, with attorneys from the formal appeals and federal litigation units also doing work that involves PCRAs. The PCRA unit, she said, also works closely with the Conviction Integrity Unit, which Krasner revamped soon after taking office.
However, when it comes to cases focusing on the more common claims about ineffective counsel, rather than allegations of broad misconduct, several attorneys said they have not seen any major changes.
“They're still fighting you tooth and nail on stuff that's not 100 percent, absolutely clear,” defense attorney Thomas Ferrant said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppeals Court Rules Pittsburgh School District Immune to Suit Over Sex Abuse of Disabled Student
4 minute readPa. Court Denies Procedurally Deficient Request for Delay Damages in $4.1M Personal Injury Verdict
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Waterbury Jury Awards $2 Million Verdict Against Eversource
- 2Walter Taggart, Villanova Law Professor, Dies at 81
- 3$2.7M Verdict for Whistleblower Exposes Employer to $300M Claim
- 4Phila. Med Mal Lawyers In for Busy Year as Court Adjusts for Filing Boom
- 5Bonus Parade Continues, With Additional Firms Matching Milbank
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250