Slip, Fall Outside of Daycare Caused Ankle, Back Injuries
On Feb. 4, 2014, plaintiff Joann Babbish, 66, a paraprofessional educator, slipped and fell on snow and ice outside Pixie Paradise Child Care Center, in West Hazelton. She fractured her ankle and claimed back injuries.
January 24, 2019 at 03:52 PM
5 minute read
Babbish v. Pixie Paradise Child Care Center
$800,000 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Oct. 25.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Luzerne No. 2016508.
Judge: Richard M. Hughes III.
Type of Action: Premises liability, slip-and-fall.
Injuries: Ankle, back injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Troy Crichton, Gibbons Legal P.C., Philadelphia.
Plaintiffs Expert: Peter A. Feinstein, orthopedic surgery; Wilkes-Barre.
Defense Counsel: Robert T. Panowicz and Joseph C. Thomas, Law Offices of Robert T. Panowicz & Associates, Wilkes-Barre.
Defense Experts: Gene Z. Salkind, neurology, Huntingdon Valley; Michael L. Brooks, neuroradiology, Thornton.
Comment:
On Feb. 4, 2014, plaintiff Joann Babbish, 66, a paraprofessional educator, slipped and fell on snow and ice outside Pixie Paradise Child Care Center, in West Hazelton. She fractured her ankle and claimed back injuries.
Babbish sued the daycare and its owner, Deborah Rizzo, alleging that they were negligent in failing to properly remediate the property. According to Babbish, prior to the accident, she and her husband parked their vehicle curbside to the daycare's entrance, which was only a few feet away. Babbish exited the vehicle to pick up their grandson. As she left the daycare while carrying her grandson, Babbish slipped and fell on snow and ice. Babbish and her husband testified that there was a partially shoveled pathway to the daycare's entrance, but in order to access the pathway, a person had to step over an area on the sidewalk that was packed with accumulated snow. This is where Babbish had fallen. The snow had accumulated as a result of the daycare setting aside the shoveled snow. Babbish's counsel maintained that the daycare created an unintended obstacle by placing the shoveled snow curbside, where patrons were known to park, and by doing so it interfered with their entering and exiting the building.
The defense argued that the daycare had properly removed snow and ice on its premises, and it presented photographs to support the claim. The defense questioned whether Babbish had fallen as she alleged. The daycare cited a note in her emergency-room records that stated, Babbish “fell at home immediately prior to arrival.”
Later that evening, Babbish believing that she suffered a sprained right ankle, due to pain and swelling, presented to an emergency room. She was diagnosed with a fracture of the right distal fibula and placed in a cast. For the next 10 weeks, Babbish remained in the cast and remained non-weight-bearing.
In April, by the time Babbish's cast was removed, she allegedly began experiencing low-back pain. She presented to an orthopedic surgeon, who, via an MRI, diagnosed her with an exacerbation of degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine. She was put on a course of physical therapy, which she treated through August. Her treatment included massage and exercise. Babbish was referred to a pain-management specialist, who administered two epidural injections to her back. No further injections were administered because they caused her to experience vomiting. She then treated with a course of chiropractic care for a couple of months. Her treatment consisted of massage and spinal manipulation.
In December 2014, Babbish and her surgeon determined that she required surgery; however, in the following month, she suffered a heart attack and the surgery was postponed. It was not until April 2016 that Babbish underwent a laminectomy and fusion of intervertebral discs L3-4 and L4-5. No further treatment was rendered.
Babbish's expert in orthopedic surgery causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident. According to the expert, Babbish is vulnerable for future adjacent segment disease at the intervertebral discs surrounding the fused L3-4 and L4-5 discs. As a result, she potentially requires future surgery, estimated at $100,000; yearly pain management, estimated at $5,000; and annual diagnostic studies, estimated at $5,000.
Babbish testified that she experiences constant back pain, which limits her activities of daily living. This includes getting up from chairs, bending, stooping, cooking, cleaning and interacting with her grandchildren. Her husband testified about Babbish's limitations. She sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in neurology, who examined Babbish, disputed that she suffered any back injuries related to the fall, and that any injuries she would have suffered would have been soft tissue in nature and would have resolved within weeks of treatment.
The defense's expert in neuroradiology testified that there were no changes in Babbish's pre- and post-accident radiographic studies, and that any complaints she suffered were solely attributed to her longstanding pre-existing condition.
The jury found Babbish 20 percent liable and Pixie Paradise 80 percent liable. Babbish was determined to receive $800,000, which will be accordingly reduced to $640,000.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs and defense counsel.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 2Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 3St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
- 4Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 5GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250