Crafting Your Business Plan: Why It's the Smart Move for Any Associate
There are countless articles to read about “how” to create a business plan. But exploring the “why” of having a plan may be of greater value, particularly for associates and more junior attorneys.
January 30, 2019 at 01:30 PM
4 minute read
There are countless articles to read about “how” to create a business plan. But exploring the “why” of having a plan may be of greater value, particularly for associates and more junior attorneys. Therefore, in this article we look at the benefits of creating a business plan early in your career. In short, this is one New Year's resolution truly worth keeping.
|The Business Plan
The plan is not just a document. It is a tool that attorneys prepare to take stock of experiences, skills and relationships. The plan identifies what sets you apart from other attorneys. And yet, the plan is so much more than that.
When carefully executed, the plan helps attorneys consider which clients and experiences you are seeking over a specific period. Even more importantly, the plan helps you consider how to balance your priorities and set realistic goals.
|Taking Stock
Creating the plan helps you increase self-awareness to better understand what you do, how you do it, and for whom you do it. You can examine critically who comes to you for legal work, whether internally or externally. You can probe—hopefully, honestly—your skill set and differentiators. On what matters do your colleagues routinely ask for your help? Why do those colleagues ask you? By asking yourself these questions, the answers will help you determine your strengths and areas for refinement.
|Evaluating Strengths and Areas for Growth
After taking stock, you can contemplate your strengths as an area to focus on improving and leveraging—and that includes increasing confidence. Half the battle in developing clients is gaining their trust. You earn that—and repeat business—by being effective and efficient while also demonstrating an understanding of the client's business and priorities. Next, consider what gaps in skills or experiences you want to fill. If your firm offers core competencies or experience benchmarks for your practice, use those as a guide to evaluate your experiences. Use this process to identify what experiences you want to pursue in the upcoming months—or years. It also may help you identify any blind spots or things to improve. The plan presents the opportunity for an internal conversation about obtaining new experiences. Take ownership of your practice and your path forward.
|Goals
Above all, the plan needs to be SMART—specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. That means, being able to look back and hold yourself accountable by determining if your goals were met. Specificity allows for clear action. A stranger could look at it and know what you are going to do. Measurability incorporates metrics for at-a-glance indicators as to whether you accomplished what you said you would. Working harder on time management is not a measurable goal. Entering time daily and writing a to-do list each day, by contrast, is. Achievability means setting realistic goals without selling yourself short. Part of setting your goals includes knowing your firm and your firm's clients. Context matters.
Relevancy helps make your long-term goals meaningful and carves away distractions and activities that do not make sense. And finally, time-bound actions demand that you respect and honor deadlines. You are much more likely to do something if you give yourself a deadline.
Enlist calendar reminders and help from mentors or colleagues. Monitor your progress at least quarterly, and keep your written plan within reach—be that your desktop or tablet, smartphone or smartwatch, whiteboard or corkboard.
Now you are set to tackle the plan. And more importantly, the hope is that you will be more motivated because you will have a stronger grasp of why it matters. The plan is a tool to help break down long-term goals into manageable steps. To get started, follow the outline—make an honest assessment, highlight strength and improvement points, draft SMART goals, fill any gaps, and set achievable, accountable timelines.
Kaitlyn R. Maxwell is an associate in the environmental practice at Greenberg Traurig and Alexander L. Scarola is the administrative shareholder for the firm's Philadelphia office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
- 2Musk Avoids Sanctions for Skipping SEC Testimony for Rocket Launch
- 3On Advice of DOJ Office, Special Counsel Moves to End Trump Prosecution
- 4Stars and Gripes: Merging Firms Need a ‘Superstar Culture’ for US Success
- 5Elaine Darr Brings Transformation and Value to DHL's Business
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250