Union Heavyweight Dougherty Pleads Not Guilty to Federal Charges
Politically powerful Philadelphia union leader John Dougherty claimed in federal court today that he was innocent of ripping off his own union and using a city councilman to advance his agenda.
February 01, 2019 at 03:15 PM
3 minute read
Politically powerful Philadelphia union leader John Dougherty claimed in federal court today that he was innocent of allegations that he ripped off his own union and used a city councilman to advance his agenda.
At the U.S. District Courthouse in Center City Philadelphia on Friday afternoon, Dougherty pleaded not guilty to the charges against him in a grand jury indictment spanning from 2010 to 2016 in which prosecutors allege Dougherty and his co-conspirators cost International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98 members $600,000.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Hey released Dougherty on $50,000 bail and ordered him to surrender his passport.
After the arraignment, Dougherty offered a terse statement to reporters standing outside of the courthouse in flurries and below-freezing conditions. “I am very comfortable with the team of lawyers I have,” Dougherty said, hinting that he might have more to say as the case progresses.
“I'm not going to stop doing my job,” he told reporters. “You'll see me all over the city.”
Dougherty's court appearance comes the day after City Councilman Bobby Henon's arraignment. Henon, a member of IBEW 98 is accused of doing Dougherty's bidding, including allegedly delaying legislation and drafting a resolution proposing to investigate a company that had towed Dougherty's car.
Dougherty, widely know by the nickname “Johnny Doc,” has led IBEW 98 for more than 25 years. From that perch he has been a major political force in Philadelphia and throughout Pennsylvania, providing huge amounts of funding for countless political and judicial offices. His organization also provided significant amounts of funding for the campaigns of several Democratic candidates now sitting on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, including that of his brother, Justice Kevin Dougherty.
The others who were indicted along with Dougherty and Henon are Brian Burrows, a business partner with Dougherty and president of the Local 98; Michael Neill, training director for the union's apprentice training fund; Dougherty's nephew, Brian Fiocca; Local 98 employee Niko Rodriguez; construction company owner Anthony Massa; and Marita Crawford, who has been Local 98's political director since 2011. All pleaded not guilty Friday.
The 153-page indictment outlines layers of alleged conspiracies that largely boil down to stealing money, goods and services from Local 98. Part of the conspiracy entails allegedly using union credit cards and bank accounts to buy goods for themselves—from frozen pizza to Taylor Swift concert tickets—and then falsely claiming the purchases were union-related. Another part of the indictment stems from allegations that members of Local 98's apprentice training program performed work on properties owned by Dougherty and others, including family members who were not named in the indictment, and then to again falsely claim the expenses were union-related.
The indictment also alleges that Dougherty directed union members to hire family members and close associates, and that on numerous occasions Henon acted to advance the union leader's interests.
U.S. Attorney William McSwain was recused from the investigation to avoid any potential conflicts stemming from his work at the law firm of Drinker Biddle & Reath. The case is assigned to Reading federal judge Jeffrey Schmehl.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllElectronic Travel Authorization for Visa-Exempt Travelers to the US, UK and Europe
Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Election Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250