Wells Fargo: Legal Industry Strong, Pa. and Del. Firms Even Stronger
Revenue and net income growth for big firms in the region outpaced strong numbers throughout the legal industry for 2018.
February 05, 2019 at 02:30 PM
3 minute read
Law firms across the country are likely to be celebrating as their 2018 financial results come in, and the news may be even sweeter for those based in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
According to a year-end check-in survey conducted by Wells Fargo, firms based in Pennsylvania and Delaware experienced revenue growth of 6.5 percent from 2017 to 2018. That exceeds industrywide growth of 5.9 percent, said Joseph Mendola, senior director of sales with the Wells Fargo Private Bank Legal Specialty Group.
Net income, meanwhile, grew by 8.4 percent for firms based in the region, compared to overall industry growth of 7.6 percent. Profits per equity partner increased by 8 percent, nearly in line with the overall average of 8.1 percent.
Demand increased by 3.7 percent in Pennsylvania and Delaware, compared to 2.3 percent across the industry, Wells Fargo found. Still, Mendola said, inventory grew by 4.7 percent in the region, compared to 5 percent across the industry.
“It's not like they reached their numbers by draining their inventory at the end of the year,” Mendola said.
Law firm lenders have been predicting since the middle of last year that 2018 would end up yielding better financial results than the legal industry has seen since before the Great Recession. The Wells Fargo data fell in line with that expectation, based on survey data from 150 law firms, most of which are in the Am Law 200.
In the Pennsylvania-Delaware region, 14 firms participated in the survey.
Those firms continue to be optimistic about 2019, Mendola said. They are projecting revenue growth of 4.5 percent, while the overall industry is expecting 4.4 percent revenue growth.
Pennsylvania and Delaware firms are also expecting demand growth of 2.3 percent and a standard rate increase of 5.3 percent in 2019, Wells Fargo found. Each of those expectations is slightly ahead of industrywide average projections.
“It seems like everybody is hitting on all cylinders. There's growth in demand, there's rate increases that seem to be sticking,” Mendola said.
Still, he said, factors remain that could temper that growth, including the ongoing Brexit developments in the U.K., a potential repeat government shutdown in the U.S., and the possibility of interest rate increases in the U.S. And while transactional business was strong in 2018, there was some slowdown in that work toward the end of the year, which may be why some firms hedged their forecasts, he said.
“There's a lot of concerns and a lot of potential headwinds that the industry could be facing,” Mendola said. “The other thing that we're concerned about is that if people start thinking about a recession it could become a little bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.”
However, he said, 2019 will still likely be another positive year for the legal industry.
|Read More
More Evidence Rolls In: Law Firms Boosted Revenues, Profits in 2018
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Forgotten Ballot: Expanding Voting Access for Incarcerated Populations
5 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250