Jury Hands Up $500K in Punitives Against Pa. State Trooper in Repo Case
A woman who sued the Pennsylvania State Police after a trooper assisted with the repossession of her car has been awarded $500,000 in punitive damages by a jury in Johnstown.
February 07, 2019 at 02:40 PM
3 minute read
A woman who sued the Pennsylvania State Police after a trooper assisted with the repossession of her car has been awarded $500,000 in punitive damages by a jury in Johnstown.
Angela Hyman sued Pennsylvania State Police Corporal Bryan Devlin for civil rights violations—specifically her Fourth and 14th Amendment rights to due process and freedom from unreasonable seizures of property—stemming from an October 2016 incident in which Devlin assisted a repo man repossessing her 2014 Toyota Corolla.
The 12-member jury found that Devlin committed a “reckless, malicious, or callous” violation of Hyman's rights by ordering her wife out of the car and threatening to break the windows in the process of assisting the repossession.
“This verdict by a group of citizens from the heartland of Pennsylvania sends a clear message to police officers around the commonwealth and beyond that they cannot take sides and help the repo man in civil repossessions,” said Andrew Milz of Flitter Milz in Narberth, Hyman's lawyer, in a statement. “We expect our police to maintain the peace, not breach it. Our Constitution is very clear—police simply cannot take sides in a civil dispute between private parties.”
The Office of the Attorney General, which represented the state police, did not respond to a request for comment.
The plaintiff's court papers argued, “The case exemplifies a custom of the Pennsylvania State Police unlawfully taking the side of the secured party in private civil repossessions effected without a court order. While our police are expected to keep the peace, they may not sit in judgment in their own 'curbside courtroom' and aid a bank to effect a non-judicial, self-help repossession.”
In court papers, the defendant argued the plaintiff had failed to state a claim.
“Plaintiff alleges the defendants assisted in depriving plaintiff of property in violation of her rights under the Constitution. Plaintiff's claim fails for several reasons, but foremost, because it is not clear plaintiff even had a property interest in the car she offered up as collateral for a loan she admittedly failed to service,” court papers said.
The defendant continued, ” As to Corporal Bryan Devlin, requesting that plaintiff's relationship partner, a trespasser in relation to the vehicle, exit a vehicle hooked to the back of a tow truck in order to resolve a disturbance does not rise to the level of a Constitutional violation.”
Trooper Michael Morris was a defendant but was dismissed from the litigation before the case went to verdict.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Class Action Allowed to Move Forward Against Philadelphia's 'Courtesy Towing' Program, Judge Rules Class Action Allowed to Move Forward Against Philadelphia's 'Courtesy Towing' Program, Judge Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2022/09/Philadelphia-City-Hall-05-767x633.jpg)
Class Action Allowed to Move Forward Against Philadelphia's 'Courtesy Towing' Program, Judge Rules
4 minute read![High Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA High Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/04/Legal-Fees-767x633.jpg)
High Court Revives Kleinbard's Bid to Collect $70K in Legal Fees From Lancaster DA
4 minute read![Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/05/Philadelphia-City-Hall-05-767x633.jpg)
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute read![Dispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement Dispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bc/19/c9c14a9d4990a3602d703f767dfa/drake-bearden-jr-767x633.jpg)
Dispute Over Failure to Accommodate Disability Ends in $900K Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.