Allentown Pharma Company Agrees to Pay $4M Penalty for Allegedly Dodging FDA Fees
Lehigh Valley Technologies, an Allentown-based pharmaceutical company, has entered into a $4 million agreement with the government to settle claims that it schemed to avoid paying certain FDA fees, Philadelphia-area U.S. Attorney William McSwain announced Friday.
February 22, 2019 at 05:10 PM
3 minute read
Lehigh Valley Technologies, an Allentown-based pharmaceutical company, has entered into a $4 million agreement with the government to settle claims that it schemed to avoid paying certain FDA fees, Philadelphia-area U.S. Attorney William McSwain announced Friday.
In the False Claims Act case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, prosecutors accused the company of attempting to duck fees for new drug applications (NDA) to the Food and Drug Administration required by the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. The revenue from fees is used to fund the drug approval process.
The FDA grants a waiver of the fee to a small business submitting its first application. In deciding whether to grant the waiver, the agency considers whether an affiliate of the company, including large businesses, have already received the fee waiver. McSwain said the purpose of the fee waiver is to level the playing field for small businesses that submit an application by eliminating an otherwise prohibitive cost for a first-time business.
In this case, prosecutors alleged that Lehigh Valley Technologies already received a waiver for a previous new drug application and was ineligible for a second. The cost for the new drug applications would have been $2 million.
Lehigh Valley allegedly paid two other companies to submit new drug applications for it in order to bypass the fees.
“As alleged, the sole purpose of the arrangement was for those companies to serve as a front and allow LVT to avoid the FDA fees that the FDA otherwise would have required it to pay,” McSwain said in a statement issued Friday. “The arrangement was illegal. Like we did today, we will hold companies accountable that scheme to avoid the fees that enable the FDA to carry out its vitally important drug approval process.”
FDA Criminal Investigations special agent Mark S. McCormack was the agent in charge of the investigation.
“The FDA laws and accompanying regulations for funding drug approvals are designed, in part, to encourage companies, even small businesses, to create new drugs,” McCormack said. “When companies attempt to game the system to avoid paying these critical fees, we will bring them to justice.”
According the settlement agreement, half of the payout was designated for restitution. The government also tacked on 4 percent interest accruing from December. The two $2 million installments must be paid within nine months of the agreement.
Lehigh Valley is represented by Mark A. Rush of K&L Gates in Pittsburgh.
“As set forth in the settlement agreement, acknowledged and executed by the government, LVT disputes the government's contention that the False Claims Act was violated,” Rush said in an email. “Having said that, LVT is a good corporate citizen committed to cooperating with the FDA and believes it was in the best interest of all to resolve the dispute in the matter set forth in the settlement agreement. This resolution ends a point of contention between the FDA and LVT so that both parties can move forward in a cooperative fashion.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute read3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 2Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
- 3'Intrusive' Parental Supervision Orders Are Illegal, NY Appeals Court Says
- 4Federal Laws Also Preempt State's Swipe Fee Law on Out-of-State Banks, Judge Rules
- 5Judge Grills DOJ on Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.