Ballard Spahr Sees Big Revenue Gain, Slight Profit Dip After Midwest Merger
Gross revenue was up 17.4 percent while profits per equity partner dipped 2.8 percent from 2017 to 2018, as the firm completed a major merger.
March 01, 2019 at 05:21 PM
4 minute read
Ballard Spahr saw significant gross revenue growth in the year following the biggest merger in its history, while profits per equity partner (PEP) took a slight hit in the midst of integration.
The Philadelphia-based firm saw gross revenue increase by 17.4 percent, to $414.88 million in 2018, up from $353.34 million in 2017. Revenue per lawyer was roughly flat, increasing by 0.6 percent, to $689,000.
PEP was down 2.8 percent from 2017 to 2018, dipping to $620,000. But net income was up 16.7 percent, to $162.98 million.
Ballard Spahr chairman Mark Stewart said the 2018 PEP was still the second best the firm has seen. “This is part of the process,” he said, of “trying to create a foundation to compete.”
The firm made its merger with Minneapolis-based Lindquist & Vennum official at the start of 2018. Just a couple months before, in the fall of 2017, it had acquired media law boutique Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
Integrating all those lawyers was “the biggest thing we've ever undertaken,” Stewart said.
The firm's total head count, on a full-time equivalent basis, went from 516 in 2017 to 602 last year. Its equity partnership grew by 20.1 percent, to 263 partners. Ballard Spahr doesn't have a nonequity tier.
Among strong practices in 2018 were intellectual property litigation, the firm's Chancery practice in Delaware, and finance practices including public finance, transactional finance and real estate finance, Stewart said.
Bankruptcy continued to be weaker, he said, and litigation “felt a little slowdown” as some big matters resolved.
|Courting the Midmarket
The entrance into Minneapolis was aimed at strengthening the corporate practice and increasing contact with midmarket clients, Stewart said. Those clients, he noted, “are more reliant on their lawyers,” because they don't have large in-house legal departments.
“It's a lucrative place for us,” and one in which Ballard Spahr's rate structure fits well, he said.
Ballard Spahr did raise rates by an average of 3 percent across the firm, he said. And the Lindquist & Vennum lawyers' rate structures have been adjusted gradually over time to be more in-line with the rest of the firm's business, he said.
But Stewart said the firm has been aiming to increase its revenue without constant rate increases, looking to improved project management as way to achieve that. “That's working,” he said, noting increases in the firm's realization rate over recent years.
About 17 percent of the firm's work is handled under alternative fee arrangements, he said. And the firm's chief client value officer, Melissa Prince, whose role was made official at the beginning of last year, has become increasingly involved in customizing those arrangements.
Prince's office used to be a fairly quiet place, Stewart said, but “now it's Grand Central Station” as lawyers within the firm increasingly seek Prince's help in customizing aspects of their client relationships.
In addition to the merger, Ballard Spahr added several lateral hires, including fintech and payment systems lawyer Chris Ford and IP and startup partner John Zurawski.
The firm started this year with several other lateral acquisitions as well. Ballard Spahr took a federal lobbying group from Nossaman in Washington, D.C., after long seeking to add federal lobbying capabilities. And it brought on commercial and intellectual property litigator Aliza Karetnick from Duane Morris as a partner in Philadelphia.
The firm also saw cybercrime prosecutor Edward McAndrew leave for DLA Piper last month. And earlier this year, project finance co-leader Tom Hoffman left for Foley & Lardner, while labor and employment partner Daniel Johns headed to Cozen O'Connor.
In 2019, the firm will look to rebuild its cyber practice, which is in progress, Stewart said.
It will also continue to focus efforts on improving project management, and may eventually seek to grow in the Florida and Texas legal markets, he said.
Asked whether any more mergers might be on the table, Stewart said, “if it's in the best interests of the firm.”
However, he added, “If you ask our partners, they'd say let's focus on making what we've got a 100 percent success.”
|Read More
One Year After Lindquist Merger, Ballard Spahr Still Focused on Midwest
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhile Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
4 minute readThe Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250