Phila. City Council Eyes Child Care for Jurors, Victims and Witnesses
Failure to provide child care services for jurors, victims and witnesses can lead to a host of problems for the justice system, including failures to comply with subpoenas, delays in court proceedings and less diverse jury pools, leaders from Philadelphia's legal community told members of Philadelphia's City Council on Monday.
March 04, 2019 at 06:55 PM
4 minute read
Failure to provide child care services for jurors, victims and witnesses can lead to a host of problems for the justice system, including failures to comply with subpoenas, delays in court proceedings and less diverse jury pools, leaders from Philadelphia's legal community told members of Philadelphia's City Council on Monday.
The comments came during a City Council hearing that looked into whether the governing body should consider a resolution aimed at providing child care services for those who use Philadelphia courts. The hearing, which was convened through a resolution by Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown, ended with the at-large councilwoman promising to develop a bill outlining a more detailed proposal to provide the services.
“This is step one,” Brown said at the conclusion of the more than hour-long hearing Monday.
Speaking at the hearing were Mike Lee, director of legislation at the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office; Rhonda Hill Wilson, co-chair of the Pennsylvania Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness; Lynn Marks, chairwoman of the First Judicial District's Juror Participation Initiative Committee; and Tianna Kalogerakis, president of the Barristers' Association of Philadelphia.
Each voiced support for providing the child care services.
According to Lee, victims and witnesses in criminal cases might see the biggest direct benefit when it comes to providing child care services. He said oftentimes victims and witnesses are forced to choose between either bringing their children to court with them or simply ignoring a subpoena, which can lead to long delays in cases.
“This conflict adds to the stress, emotional trauma and pressure already created by the justice system,” he said, adding that failure to provide the care can also erode trust in the justice system.
Kalogerakis also said her organization is “acutely aware of the disproportionately negative effect the criminal justice system has on black and brown people,” and that having jury pools that under-represent those communities can have severe impacts on a party's rights.
“We must do all that we can to eliminate barriers for black and brown individuals to be able to serve on a jury for their peers,” she said.
Although the hearing was the first official work from City Council to look into the issue, according to Brown, her office, along with Wilson, have been looking into the issue for more than the past year, with representatives of the Montgomery County court system, which has been providing child care services to court users for 25 years.
Wilson, a trial attorney, said the issue affects both the criminal and civil systems, and she rarely sees young men and women serving on juries. She noted that, along with Montgomery County, courts in Allegheny County, Cambria and Monroe already have child care programs, which she said could serve as a model for any system Philadelphia may adopt.
“I'm here with a solution and a remedy,” Wilson said, suggesting that the program could be funded with a $5 charge on all cases that come through the courts.
In May the FJD's Juror Participation Initiative Committee reported that between 36 or 42 percent of Philadelphia residents, or about 200,000 people, fail to respond to mailed jury summonses each year. The committee placed child care as one of the top five hardships jurors face, and recommended a court-sponsored program that could be funded through fees or a donation or voucher program.
Marks, speaking Monday, said that committee found that women and young people are disproportionately affected by this issue. But having a diverse jury pool is fundamental to the justice system.
“We cannot over-emphasize the importance of having a robust cross-section of the members of Philadelphia,” Marks said.
Brown did not say Monday when she would likely have a bill, but before heading to the full council, it will likely be reviewed first by the Committee on Law and Government.
Read the commission's report:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStevens & Lee Hires Ex-Middle District of Pennsylvania U.S. Attorney as White-Collar Co-Chair
3 minute readJudge Tanks Prevailing Pittsburgh Attorneys' $2.45M Fee Request to $250K
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250