The Attraction to E-Cigarettes Is Actually One of Its Biggest Risks
What is most attractive about e-cigarettes like the JUUL is that they come in a variety of flavors and are widely accessible, drawing in JUUL's most common user, the young adult.
March 08, 2019 at 11:04 AM
5 minute read
Growing up, I fondly remember the excitement over Baskin-Robbins' “31 flavors.” The slogan originated in 1953 and was a big deal at the time because it was unusual for an ice cream shop to have so many flavor options. Oh how times have changed. In 2019, consumers are now accustomed to and expect variety and instant gratification thanks to programs like Amazon Prime, where you can get a plethora of items delivered to your door the same day.
E-cigarettes are no exception.
Background
By now, most people are familiar with the term JUUL (for those of you who are unfamiliar, no that is not a typo, and I am not referring to a precious stone). The JUUL was introduced to the market in June 2015 as an e-cigarette., see “PAX Labs Introduces Revolutionary Technologies with Powerful E-Cigarette JUUL,” BusinessWire (2015). According to its press release, the JUUL was initially touted as an “alternative smoking product that delivers a nicotine experience truly akin to a cigarette, with two times the nicotine strength and three times the vapor quality of leading competitive products.” Despite there being a multitude of e-cigarettes on the market today, JUUL seems to get the most attention. What is most attractive about e-cigarettes like the JUUL is that they come in a variety of flavors and are widely accessible, drawing in JUUL's most common user, the young adult. As of the writing of this article, the JUUL website sells eight flavors and offer the option for auto-ship, which would have the product delivered regularly on a cycle. By way of example, an on-demand convenience delivery service, goPuff, can have a JUUL starter kit or pack of “pods” (the name for a JUUL cartridge) delivered to your door in mere minutes. However, the similarities between Baskin-Robbins and JUUL stop at the variety each brand offers. Unfortunately, JUUL's e-cigarettes carry far more risks than Baskin-Robbins' ice cream.
Risks Associated With E-Cigarettes
By way of background, the surgeon general suggests that e-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco products among youth, with the majority of young adult users between 18-24 years of age, see “E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General,” U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (2016). In 2014, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that more than a quarter million youth who had previously never smoked a cigarette had begun to use e-cigarettes in 2013, which is three times greater than those reported in 2011, see Rimer, Sara, “Behind the Vapor,” Boston University Research. Research shows that the risks of e-cigarettes are directed primarily toward youth.
A recent study found that 2,039 Californians, ages 16 to 20 who used e-cigarettes between 2015 to 2017 advanced to using traditional cigarettes, which are more dangerous, see Dubar, Michael S., “Disentangling Within—and Between—Person Effects of Shared Risk Factors on E-Cigarette and Cigarette Use Trajectories From Late Adolescence to Young Adulthood,” Nicotine & Tobacco Research (Oct. 2, 2018). Electronic cigarettes are a path to nicotine addiction for youth, see Chen, Angus, “Teenagers Embrace JUUL, Saying It's Discreet Enough to Vape in Class,” NPR (Dec. 4, 2017). This is likely due to the fact that about 60 percent of teenagers are unaware that this device contains nicotine—the highly addictive chemical that causes damage to brain development, among other serious health problems, Preidt, Robert, “Many Teens Don't Know Juul Contains Addictive Nicotine,” U.S. News (April 18, 2018).
In addition to being a pathway to increased nicotine intake, e-cigarettes contain more toxins from the flavor additives in e-liquids. What makes e-cigarettes, like the JUUL, so attractive is actually one its biggest risks—studies show that the direct additives in flavorings found in e-liquids have been proven harmful if inhaled. The American Lung Association has highlighted Diacetyl, the chemical used to flavor e-liquids in the cartridges of e-cigarettes, as a chemical responsible for causing serious lung problems. Given Diacetyl's harm, the chemical was banned from being used to flavor popcorn in 2007 and the U.K. banned the use of Diacetyl in e-cigarette liquid in 2016. When inhaled, Diacetyl causes bronchiolitis obliterans—more commonly referred to as “popcorn lung”—a scarring of the tiny air sacs in the lungs resulting in the thickening and narrowing of the airways. This is a serious lung disease that causes coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath, similar to the symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Acrylonitrile, another compound often found in fruit flavorings favored by adolescents, is also highly poisonous and also used in the manufacturing of plastics, adhesives and synthetic rubber, according to the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Both Eugenol, a compound found in a flavor like clove oil and cinnamaldehyde, a compound found in a cinnamon-like flavorings, have also been linked to the development of asthma. Such findings about compounds contained in common flavor additives show e-cigarettes, even without nicotine, are not entirely safe.
Perhaps what is most disturbing is the unknown as research could reveal even more health risks associated with e-cigarettes as time wanes on. As with many “revolutionary” products, only time will tell as to how impending medical research or the legal implications will affect the e-cigarette market.
Emily B. Ashe is an associate in Anapol Weiss' mass tort department. She concentrates her practice on defective medical devices and pharmaceutical drug cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
- 2Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
- 3From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 4‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 5LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250