Defense: Bar Provided Reasonable Security in Shooting
On Oct. 18, 2013, plaintiffs' decedent Donald Lowry, 46, was fatally shot by Wesley Richards at JR's Bar, in Pittsburgh. A bouncer intervened, but another patron, Walter Banks, struck the bouncer with a bottle.
March 14, 2019 at 02:20 PM
3 minute read
Lowry v. J.W.R.
$750,300 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 30, 2018.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-15-017902.
Judge: Donald R. Walko Jr.
Type of Action: Wrongful death, premises liability.
Injuries: Death.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Steven M. Barth; Barth & Associates, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Expert: Russell Kolins, security/premises liability, Philadelphia.
Defense Counsel: Wayne V. DeLuca and John D. Eddy, PGH Law, Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On Oct. 18, 2013, plaintiffs' decedent Donald Lowry, 46, was fatally shot by Wesley Richards at JR's Bar, in Pittsburgh. A bouncer intervened, but another patron, Walter Banks, struck the bouncer with a bottle. The bouncer, though stunned, was able to push Richards and Banks outside the bar. The two men fled and were later apprehended. They were criminally charged and are imprisoned.
Lowry's estate, which was represented by his mother and sister, sued Richards; Banks; the bar's owner, J.W.R. Inc.; and the premises' owner, Aaron Auber. The estate alleged that Richards assaulted and battered Lowry, that Banks contributed to the incident, and that the remaining defendants negligently failed to provide adequate security.
A default judgment was entered against Richards and Banks, after they did not answer the estate's pleadings. The court determined that they were negligent, that their negligence was a factual cause of harm to Lowry, and that their conduct was outrageous.
Surveillance footage of the incident was played at trial. Lowry's counsel maintained that the bar and Auber failed in their duties to provide a safe and enjoyable environment to its patrons, and to protect them from foreseeable harm.
The estate's expert in security opined that, since the bar had taken measures to hire security at its establishment, it had an obligation to make sure the individuals were properly and adequately trained and supervised. The expert determined that the bar failed to provide proper and adequate security to screen patrons entering the establishment for weapons, as Richards was able to enter the bar carrying a weapon.
The defense argued that Richards and Banks were solely responsible for the fatal incident, and it maintained that JR's Bar and Auber took all reasonable security measures to avoid violent incidents. The bouncer testified that he used a handheld metal detector on every patron the evening of the incident, including Richards and Banks, and found that neither man was carrying a firearm. The defense asserted that Richards somehow snuck the gun into the bar undetected.
The defense further argued that, in its 30-plus years, JR's bar never had a violent incident or ever had its liquor license revoked or suspended.
Lowry was taken by ambulance to a hospital where he was pronounced dead shortly thereafter. He is survived by five children. His estate sought damages under the Wrongful Death and Survival Acts. Lowry's estate further sought punitive damages against Richards, Banks, Auber and J.W.R.
The defense maintained that Lowry's estate was not entitled to any damages.
The jury found that J.W.R. and Auber were not negligent. The jury awarded $750,300 in punitive damages against Richards and Banks. Zero damages in wrongful death and survival action were awarded.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel and counsel of Auber and J.W.R. The remaining defendants' counsel were not asked to contribute.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 2'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 3Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
- 5State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250