Crowded Field Vying for Six Seats on Phila. Common Pleas Bench
The crowded field is only slightly fewer than the 50 candidates who fought for nine open seats on the Common Pleas bench in 2017, and the 47 candidates who fought for 12 open seats on the Common Pleas bench and three Municipal Court slots in 2015.
March 15, 2019 at 02:06 PM
3 minute read
There may not be as many seats available as in previous years, but the race to become a judge in Philadelphia is just about as crowded as usual.
As of the March 12 deadline to get on the ballot for 2019 judicial races, 41 contenders have filed to vie for six open seats on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. Thirteen candidates have also filed to fill one vacancy in the Municipal Court. All but two of the Municipal Court candidates are also seeking spots on the Common Pleas bench.
The crowded field is only slightly fewer than the 50 candidates who fought for nine open seats on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas bench in 2017, and the 47 candidates who fought for 12 open seats on the Common Pleas bench and three Municipal Court slots in 2015.
As for why the number of available seats is down, observers pointed to the amendment passed in late 2016 that raised the age of judicial retirement from 70 to 75.
As for why the number of candidates remains high, observers said the job comes with a good salary, benefits and prestige, as well as an opportunity to serve the public.
“People who want to serve as judge and who want to serve the public in that way, that desire isn't going to go away based on the number of slots,” election attorney Adam Bonin said.
Jeff Jubelirer also noted that a judgeship can be seen as capstone on a legal career, or a launching points for other political endeavors, noting that former Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne Abraham was a judge for decades before taking on the role of Philadelphia's top prosecutor.
See the List of Candidates:
|Although interest remains high, observers also noted that the number of candidates is likely to drop significantly when ballot placement is determined, which is often the largest factor in determining outcome. In 2017, the top four vote-getters were listed on the ballot as first, second, 25th and third on the ballot, respectively.
The ballot placement is expected to be set March 20.
Jubelirer noted that party endorsement is another stage where the field is likely to narrow.
“If you go against the party, you have to go to the wards to get them to put your name on the sample ballots,” Jubelirer said. “But it's still not going to be as big an effort as the party.”
The current field includes multiple candidates who are running for at least the second time and several familiar faces, including Beth Grossman, who ran unsuccessfully against Larry Krasner in the 2017 race to become Philadelphia's district attorney. According to the Department of State, Grossman is also the only candidate that is running on both the Democratic and Republican tickets.
Court watchers also lauded the field for its diversity.
Although currently the field is skewed heavily white—with at least 32 candidates being white and seven being African-American—there is more parity when it comes to gender, with 19 women and 22 men running. Also, if elected, Kay Yu would become Pennsylvania's first Korean-American judge, and Henry Sias would become the first transgender man in the country to be elected judge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250