Reed Smith Continues Cultivating Cannabis Practice
It's one of several Pennsylvania-based Am Law 100 and Am Law 200 firms that have spent the past few years honing their abilities to service clients in the marijuana industry.
March 15, 2019 at 01:41 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Reed Smith has brought on Marc Hauser, who recently chaired Napa Valley boutique GVM Law's cannabis law department, to help grow its cannabis law practice.
Hauser moved from Chicago to California's Napa Valley during the winter of 2017, drawn by the Golden State's better weather and thriving wine industry. However, as more states legalize the use of cannabis, the self-proclaimed "wine nerd" has also found himself getting more involved in deals relating to the cannabis industry.
"The legal cannabis industry is still relatively new in this country and quickly changing," Hauser said. "As more investment capital comes in, as competition from the legal Canadian companies comes in, as companies are quickly trying to gain a national presence, as a result, there is a lot of consolidation."
Hauser joined Reed Smith last week as counsel in its global corporate group, and co-vice chair of the global firm's cannabis law team. At Reed Smith, Hauser will represent businesses and investors in the cannabis and hemp industries, advising on transactions and risk-related matters.
"Deals are getting bigger and bigger, the industry is now solidly in the middle market," he explained. "There is an opportunity for national and international firms to help out and provide the kind of legal work that is necessary to get a large deal done.
Hauser began his legal career at Goldberg Kohn in Chicago in 1998, later moving to Sachnoff & Weaver, which merged with Reed Smith in 2006. He then joined Equity Group Investments in 2002, a Chicago-based private investment company founded by Sam Zell, as associate general counsel. He spent 15 years at the investment firm before moving over to Napa's GVM Law.
"I've known Marc for nearly two decades, and I'm thrilled that he has joined Reed Smith," Matt Petersen, co-head of the firm's global corporate group, said in a statement. "Marc is a corporate attorney who has structured and advised on all types of complex transactions, bringing a practical approach to business and risk issues that impact all businesses and investors. His dual perspective, coming from both in-house and in private practice, is a great addition to our strong transactional practice."
Reed Smith, which has been expanding its cannabis law practice on both coasts, now has a total of 19 lawyers advising the cannabis industry, including 16 partners, according to its website.
It's one of several Pennsylvania-based Am Law 100 and Am Law 200 firms that have spent the past few years honing their abilities to service clients in the marijuana industry. Cozen O'Connor, Fox Rothschild, Duane Morris, Pepper Hamilton and Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney all have formalized cannabis practices.
Last October, Duane Morris announced a partnership with the American Trade Association of Cannabis and Hemp. ATACH promotes the expansion of legal marijuana sales for industrial, medical and adult recreational use, and its members include businesses in the marijuana and hemp industry, as well as established companies looking to enter it. According to both sides, it was the first time a national cannabis trade organization has teamed up with an Am Law 100 law firm.
And late last year, Cozen represented cannabis company Acreage Holdings Inc. in its $160 million acquisition of cannabis manufacturer Form Factory Inc.
But not every Big Law firm has been as eager to jump into the fray.
When Philadelphia-based attorney Alva Mather left Pepper Hamilton for DLA Piper last year, she brought her alcoholic beverage industry practice with her, but left the aspect of her work that had focused on the cannabis industry behind—at least for the time being.
She said at the time that DLA Piper as a firm had decided not to become involved in the growing cannabis industry, as state and federal marijuana laws differ.
"I hope I will just be delaying my involvement in that industry," she said. "Eventually the laws will have to come to some better structure than they are now."
Zack Needles contributed to this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 2Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 3Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 4Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
- 5Waterbury Jury Awards $2 Million Verdict Against Eversource
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250