Risk and Trust: Keys to Evaluating a Lateral's Transferrable Business
More than ever, law firms are relying on lateral recruiting as a primary growth strategy for increasing revenue. Unfortunately, many lateral hires fail to meet law firm expectations.
March 15, 2019 at 11:26 AM
6 minute read
More than ever, law firms are relying on lateral recruiting as a primary growth strategy for increasing revenue. Unfortunately, many lateral hires fail to meet law firm expectations. Studies show that up to 38 percent of lateral hires leave within five years, and an estimated 41 percent are “unsuccessful,” according to a global lateral hire risk mitigation study by Decipher and Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group as reported by ALM.
In a competitive and crowded market, how do you determine whether a lateral candidate's promised book of business is truly portable? What can you do to ensure a lateral partner hire is accurately representing his client relationships, and how can you assess the likelihood the business will follow? There is no magic formula. The whole process is a delicate balance between trusting a candidate's transparency and taking a calculated risk, but by incorporating these five simple best practices into your recruiting process, you increase your likelihood of predicting a lateral candidate's potential for success.
|Expand Your Data Analysis
The majority of law firms rely on the Lateral Partner Questionnaire (LPQ) to gather information about a candidate's background, practice, billing rates, originations and collections, clients, etc. While this provides a snapshot into a candidate's past and current practice and clients, it does not enable you to analyze the strength of existing relationships or the likelihood clients will follow to a new firm.
The key is to ask the right questions. If your current LPQ does not focus on client relationships, consider adding a few questions that allow you to dig deeper into these relationships and assess the strength of each. Focusing on the past three years, ask:
- Has your book of business increased or decreased, and by what percentage?
- Which clients are new within this timeframe?
- What percentage of growth stems from new matters with existing clients?
- What percentage of growth stems from new matters from new clients?
The answers should help you get a more accurate picture of the overall value of a lateral's portable business, provide you with insights into his business development activities, and identify potential synergies as you move to the next phase of evaluation.
|Identify Client and Business Development Synergies
After an initial evaluation, you need to expand the scope of your due diligence to include a review and analysis of the candidate's business development and marketing activities, strategies, and skills.
- How does the candidate remain engaged with existing clients and attract new ones?
- Is this approach consistent with your firm's culture?
- Are there opportunities to leverage the lateral's existing relationships within the practice group to grow the business?
- Are there any potential conflicts with your firm's existing clients?
All of these factors will help to ensure a smooth transition once the hire starts at your firm.
|Leverage Technology
Available technology can assist recruiters and law firms in their efforts to vet potential lateral candidates and the portability of their clients. For example, Monitor Suite—a business development software application that helps analyze legal data such as litigation, billing, case and prospective customer trends—enables you to evaluate the portability of a lateral's book of business. This type of business intelligence can provide critical information on how ingrained a particular client is with a given attorney. This analysis can help you determine how critical the candidate is to the client and vice versa. Questions to consider:
- How much business has the client done with the current firm?
- How many matters has the client had with the attorney over the past few years?
- Has the client used other lawyers at the candidate's current firm?
- Does the client leverage the services of other practice groups at the firm?
These factors will help you to determine the level of loyalty an existing client may have for either the candidate or the firm for which the candidate currently works. The more ingrained the client is with other attorneys and practice groups, the less likely that client will be to move with your potential hire.
|Understand Lateral Hire Motivators
Laterals are typically motivated by specific reasons in their search to switch firms; it's your job to understand why. Compensation is often the primary driver, but other factors, such as lack of commitment to a practice area, brand decline, ineffective management, lack of loyalty and/or conflicts, may be the root cause as well. Understanding the lateral's “why” is important. If it seems he is running away from a situation rather than seeking out your firm for specific qualities, raise the red flag. It is very important to ensure the candidate's primary motivation for moving aligns with your expectations and goals, and that you discuss these motivations and expectations at the start of the hiring process.
|Learn From Your Past Successes and Failures
As all law firms know, not all lateral hires succeed. To minimize risk, it is important that your firm tracks the performance of lateral hires to identify the factors that have contributed to both success and failure. Review past and present billable hours, revenues, billings and collections, production, profitability margins and business development hours. These performance indicators can help identify trends that can be used to predict future lateral candidates' potential for growing their books of business.
Recruiting successful lateral hires is a key growth strategy for many law firms in today's legal industry. While there are no guarantees that the attorney you hire will grow your firm's revenue, several key factors can help ensure success. While the value of a lateral's portable business may drive the initial stages of the recruiting process, dig deep into the details of relationships and client metrics, and don't be afraid to ask tough questions. The more knowledge you have about the candidate's practice and depth of client relationships, the less risk you are assuming and the sounder the decision to hire will be.
Jessica L. Gangjee is the director of recruitment and professional development at Burns White. She leads the firm's talent management initiatives including all aspects of attorney hiring, integration and assimilation, as well as the advancement and implementation of professional development programming. She also partners with senior management to support various firm committees including the diversity and inclusion committee and the women's initiative committee, and leads initiatives focused on mentorship, leadership training and strategic planning that allow the firm to recruit and retain the most talented attorneys to support the firm's strategic agenda.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSettlement With Kleinbard in Diversity Contracting Tiff Allows Pa. Lawyer to Avoid Sanctions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250