US Judge Asks Expert to Weigh In on Audio Leaked During Filming of Meek Mill Documentary
U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week issued an order asking the parties to either agree on an expert to evaluate the audio tape or submit names of qualified experts who could review the tape for authenticity.
March 18, 2019 at 03:58 PM
3 minute read
The federal judge overseeing the dispute between Roc Nation, a subsidiary of retail giant Amazon and a prominent Philadelphia attorney that stemmed from the filming of a documentary series about the rapper Meek Mill has asked the parties to have an expert review the allegedly leaked audio recording that is at the center of the controversy.
U.S. District Judge Gerald McHugh of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania last week issued an order asking the parties to either agree on an expert to evaluate the audio tape or submit names of qualified experts who could review the tape for authenticity.
“Following review of the expert's analysis, the court will consider granting leave to the parties for any supplemental submissions that may be relevant,” McHugh said.
The audio tape is central to claims that Philadelphia attorney A. Charles Peruto Jr. brought last year against Amazon Studios, Roc Nation and others for allegedly violating the Wiretap Act when he was recorded, allegedly without his knowledge, during the filing of the docuseries about Mill and the justice system.
On the audio, which was eventually leaked to The Philadelphia Inquirer, Peruto can be heard saying, among other things, that the conduct of his client, Philadelphia Judge Genece Brinkley, who oversaw high-profile criminal proceedings against Mill, “looks fucking awful.”
According to Peruto, a portion of the audio was cut out of the leaked recording, which would have given the proper context to his comments, in which he said he praised the judge for following the law. He also said he made the comments off the record, and when he believed the camera had been turned off.
The defendants have asked the court to dismiss the claims, contending, among other things, that Peruto never said the conversation should be off the record, and that under the federal Wiretap Act, only consent from one of the parties is needed.
“Simply put, because the recording itself and the subsequent dissemination of the recording were lawful, Peruto cannot state a federal Wiretap Act claim against any of the defendants as a matter of law,” the defendants said in a joint motion.
The docuseries, which is set to be released on Amazon's streaming service over the summer, focuses on the criminal proceedings against Mill, whose real name is Robert Williams, and the numerous criminal justice issues that arose out of his case.
Mill's case caught national attention in late 2017 after Brinkley sentenced the hip-hop star to a lengthy jail sentence for a probation violation, even though neither Mill's probation officer nor the prosecutor on the case had sought jail time.
The sentence garnered national attention and sparked an outcry for criminal justice reforms. It also led to a protracted appeals process, which has spurred hundreds of additional appeals involving cases from Mill's arresting officer, led one court employee to be fired, and raised an ethical cloud over Brinkley, which eventually led her to hire Peruto.
A teaser trailer for the docuseries was posted Sunday.
Ballard Spahr attorney Michael Berry is representing Amazon, and Joshua Peles of Reed Smith is representing Roc Nation. Neither attorney immediately returned a call for comment. Jim Beasley Jr. of The Beasley Firm, who is representing Peruto, declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEx-DLA Piper, Ballard Spahr Atty Accused of Aiding Video Game Company Founder's Misappropriation Scheme
5 minute readFrom M&A to Music Fest, Ballard Spahr Attorney Hosts Week-Long Jam Session With Help of Clients
5 minute read$43.5M Med Mal Verdict for Ex-Eagles Team Captain Withstands Appellate Challenge
Pa. Casinos Ask Court to Force State to Tax Skill Games Found in Stores Equally to Slots
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 2K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 3'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 4Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 5After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.