Jury Awards $24.8M to Roofer Injured in Skylight Fall
A roofer who suffered a brain injury and numerous fractures after falling through a skylight has won a nearly $25 million verdict.
March 21, 2019 at 03:38 PM
5 minute read
A roofer who suffered a brain injury and numerous fractures after falling through a skylight has won a nearly $25 million verdict.
A Philadelphia jury on Wednesday awarded $24.8 million to Sean Kalinowski, a roofer who was catastrophically injured in June 2016. The verdict came after more than a day of jury deliberations and nearly four full weeks of trial before Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Lisa Rau.
Kalinowski and his wife, Michele Kalinowski, who also had a significant loss of consortium claim, were represented by Eisenberg, Rothweiler, Winkler, Eisenberg & Jeck attorneys Kenneth Rothweiler as first chair, Fredric Eisenberg as second chair and Todd Schoenhaus as third chair.
“We are pleased with the verdict and the award, which will allow Sean's wife to provide care for her husband and financial support for their two children,” Rothweiler said in an emailed statement.
According to the plaintiffs' pretrial memo, Sean Kalinowski, who was in his early 40s and had two minor children, was performing roofing work on a building that housed an auto body facility in Aston, when he fell through a skylight and landed on a concrete floor more than 20 feet below.
According to the memo, since the accident was not witnessed by anyone else, Kalinowski likely tripped over a pallet on the roof or the skylight mount and then crashed through the glass.
Defendant 2626 Market LLC owned the building, and ABRA Auto Body & Glass, which was also a defendant, leased the property. Although Kalinowski worked for a company, he performed the work through a small side business he had created.
Kalinowski's memo said there should have been either guard rails or screens to provide fall protection, and the defendants were negligent for failing to provide a safe workplace or warn him about the dangerous condition. Kalinowski further argued that the defendants should have known of the dangers because, not only were the protections required pursuant to Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations, another skylight had recently been damaged by a hood cover, which weighed between 50 and 70 pounds. The memo said that, at the time that skylight was being repaired, the companies were told the skylights were dangerous and could result in an injury.
The plaintiffs' experts—safety consultant Nigel Ellis, OSHA expert Jeremiah Midkiff and human factors expert William Vigilante—opined that adequate guards would have prevented the accident, the risks were foreseeable to the company, and Kalinowski would not have known about the dangers.
In its pretrial memo, 2626 Market contended that Kalinowski was partially at fault, since he had been on the roof numerous times before the accident, he was a seasoned roofer, and, as he was working for his own company during the project, he had a duty to inspect the site and ensure his own safety. The company also noted that the building was not cited by OSHA, and that the company was never told the skylight was dangerous. The company also contended that, according to its agreement with ABRA, the landlord for the property was responsible to repair and maintain the skylights.
2626 Market's liability expert, Samuel Gualardo, opined that the skylight was a “peculiar risk” that would only be known to roofers.
ABRA, in its pretrial memo, contended that Kalinowski was hired by 2626 Market, and that, since it was also not Kalinowski's employer, they did not owe him a duty of care.
ABRA's experts, James Stanley, an OSHA expert; Timothy Carlsen, an engineering expert; and Richard Baxter, a roofing expert, opined that the independent contractor had the duty to ensure the safety and that the roof was not an ABRA work area.
As a result of the fall, Kalinowski suffered a severe traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures. After the incident, Kalinowski underwent numerous intensive care treatments, including craniotomies, tracheostomy and plate fixation. He was hospitalized for two months, then treated at a nursing facility for one month, and spent three months at Bryn Mawr Rehabilitation Hospital. He was hospitalized again for seizure disorders and hardware removals.
According to his mediation memo, Kalinowski suffered partial blindness, can no longer work or live alone and needs continuous help with the tasks of daily living. Expert economist Royal Bunin opined for Kalinowski that his economic losses ranged from $20 million to $23 million.
After the nearly month-long trial, the jury found ABRA 60 percent negligent, 2626 Market 30 percent negligence and Kalinowski 10 percent at fault.
ABRA was represented by Taylor Anderson attorneys Christopher Soper and Kevin Taylor. Soper did not return a call seeking comment. 2626 Market was represented by Marc Zingarini of McGivney, Kluger & Cook and Mary Ellen Conroy of Cipriani & Werner. Zingarini did not return a call seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readEckert Seamans Snags Reed Smith Global Financial Intelligence Director
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250