Franchising in the Tech Era: 'Alexa, I Want a Burger and Fries'
The determinative factor is likely to be how strong the brand is. When we order vocally, minds are lazy and remember only the brand and its signature sandwiches. Those with the strongest connection with the consumers will win the battle of the brands for internet ordering.
March 27, 2019 at 12:46 PM
5 minute read
In the near future, fast food ordering will sound like this: “Alexa, I want a burger and fries.” So says Gary Vaynerchuk, chairman of VaynerX, a modern-day media and communications holding company. He gave this prediction at the International Franchise Association convention. Lawyers need to know this, because when Alexa fulfills this order, you want your favorite brand to be offered by Alexa. If you don't envision this future today, then how will you develop plans for your clients in the future? It is not limited to fast food, as it could just as easily be the way contractors order nails and cement.
This future is not far away. We can envision that Alexa will have a contract for delivery with Grubhub or Uber Eats. But who will supply the burger? It could be McDonalds, Burger King, Wendy's, Carl's Jr, BurgerFi, White Castle or another quick service restaurant (QSR). Or it could be a yet-to-be-branded ”Amazon Burger” or “Ali Baba Burger.” The determinative factor is likely to be how strong the brand is. When we order vocally, minds are lazy and remember only the brand and its signature sandwiches. Those with the strongest connection with the consumers will win the battle of the brands for internet ordering.
Will this burger be Black Angus, low fat sirloin or buffalo? Will it be organic or non-GMO? The branding will probably dictate the truncated list of selections. We cannot expect too much variety at first, because the delivery systems have to be perfected. But brands that have more plant based offerings will be high on the list.
Healthy lifestyles are now the rage as the boomers age. According to March 2019, issue of the Restaurant Finance Monitor, the NPD Group reports that today a fourth of consumers in the United States indicate they eat plant-based protein as well as animal-based protein, and many of these people do not identify as vegetarian or vegan. People are eating more nuts, berries, soy products, fish. The NPD Group says “Burgers represent the largest plant-based food service category with exceptionally strong growth … and it is plant-based burgers that are showing up the most on restaurant menus.”
The consumers driving the demand for plant-based protein are exactly those who are the heaviest users of the internet. According to the NPD Group survey the consumers tend to be:
- Educated professional women, age 45 and up, without children at home.
- Have a food allergy, or a medical condition where diet makes a difference.
- Check labels to find natural options including organic and non-GMO.
- It is trending with GenZ and millennials.
The brands which are now featuring menu items which are “beyond meat burgers,” are White Castle, Carl's Jr., TGI Friday's, In-N-Out Burger and Chili's. In order to stay on top, increased marketing initiatives will be needed, up to date websites and menus are essential, and for brick and mortar sales, and additional point of sale information must be displayed. Staff will need to be trained to accurately answer customer inquiries. As has already started in India, the menu board and take-out boxes will contain plant-based indicators to raise awareness and assure quality control.
In the past, plant-based options were unpopular. They were expensive, did not taste good, seemed unnecessary, and not seen as a treat like the juicy fattier options. But demand is rising, and so is the realization that these options must not only be on the menu, and attractively priced, but that they must be advertised in order that the brand will be reinforced. People need to know where to go for healthy options.
So how will the restaurants pay for this? Labor costs keep escalating and the minimum wage will keep rising. Technology may reduce some labor costs, but all of the technological intermediaries that enable ordering and delivery will soon be eliminating the thin margins now in place. Franchise restaurants may need the franchisor to reduce its fees. Reducing royalties is an anathema to franchisors and their financiers. These royalty streams are etched in stone and may not be flexible. But franchisors do have more flexibility with the costs they charge for opening new outlets, the initial franchise fees for each unit that a multiunit operator pays. Restaurant industry analyst Roger Lipton goes further to suggest that franchisors should absorb more of the technology upgrades that franchise systems need to improve. This would be particularly acute in the Alexa world where technology is king.
As consumers become more dependent on technology, branding will be the key to gaining customers. Branding for the new consumer needs to start now.
In the future, we can expect labor costs to rise. We can expect the internet fulfillment to extract greater portions of the available margin.
Craig R. Tractenberg is a partner and co-chair of the franchise practice group at Fox Rothschild where he handles complex business disputes involving intellectual property, licenses, business torts and insolvency issues. He focuses his practice on franchise companies' development and expansion. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250