Plaintiff: Motorist Caused Neck Injuries in Intersectional Crash
On Oct. 1, 2012, plaintiff Jennifer Hearn, 41, was driving south on Middle Road, toward its intersection with Wildwood Road Extension, in Hampton Township. As Hearn entered the intersection, which had no traffic-control devices, the front driver's side of her minivan was struck by the front of a sedan.
March 28, 2019 at 02:55 PM
4 minute read
Hearn v. Damico
$56,464.30 Verdict
Date of Verdict: Nov. 7, 2018.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Allegheny No. GD-14-016048.
Judge: Alan D. Hertzberg.
Type of Action: Motor vehicle.
Injuries: Neck injuries.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Brittani R. Hassen and George M. Kontos, Kontos Mengine Law Group, Pittsburgh.
Plaintiffs Expert: Adam S. Kanter, neurosurgery, Pittsburgh.
Defense Counsel: Daniel L. Rivetti and Charles P. Sapienza III, Robb Leonard Mulvihill, Pittsburgh.
Defense Expert: Daniel A. Wecht, neurosurgery, Pittsburgh.
Comment:
On Oct. 1, 2012, plaintiff Jennifer Hearn, 41, was driving south on Middle Road, toward its intersection with Wildwood Road Extension, in Hampton Township. As Hearn entered the intersection, which had no traffic-control devices, the front driver's side of her minivan was struck by the front of a sedan. The sedan had been driving in the opposite direction on Middle Road and attempted to turn left at the intersection. Hearn claimed neck injuries.
Hearn sued the sedan's driver, Richard Damico. She alleged that he was negligent in the operation of his vehicle.
According to Hearn, as she approached the intersection, she noticed Damico, traveling in the opposite direction, looking down and not at the road. Damico allegedly started turning left in front of Hearn, still looking down and not looking at her in the intersection. Hearn claimed she braked and moved her vehicle toward the right to try to avoid the imminent collision, but was unsuccessful.
Hearn's counsel argued that Damico did not have the legal right of way to enter the intersection, and nor did he have an assured clear distance to make the left turn.
The defense maintained that Hearn was contributorily negligent for the accident. Damico testified that he assured a clear distance before turning, and he did not see Hearn's vehicle. It was not until Damico was attempting the turn at the intersection that Hearn came out of nowhere and caused the collision, he alleged. The defense maintained that Hearn had a duty to yield to Damico, who was in the process of turning left, and that her failure to do so caused the accident.
Hearn was taken by ambulance to an emergency room. She was diagnosed with a fracture to her right little finger, of her dominant arm. Her finger which was splinted. An MRI of her cervical spine was abnormal. Hearn was discharged with instructions to follow up with her primary care physician.
In the ensuing days, Hearn presented to her doctor with complaints of neck pain and numbness and tingling into her arms and hands. She was put on a course of physical therapy, which consisted of massage and exercise.
On Nov. 15, Hearn presented to a neurosurgeon, who via an MRI, diagnosed her with a herniation at cervical intervertebral disc C6-7, bulging at C5-6 and annular tears at C5-6 and C6-7.
Hearn continued to consult with the neurosurgeon and treated intermittently with physical therapy. By fall 2014, it was determined that Hearn required surgery after conservative treatment only minimally improved her condition. On Oct. 31, 2014, she underwent a decompression and fusion at C5-6 and C6-7. Following the surgery, Hearn followed up with her neurosurgeon. No further treatment was rendered.
Hearn's neurosurgeon causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident, and opined that she suffered a permanent injury.
Hearn alleged that she continues to experience ongoing neck pain. This allegedly interferes with caring for her daughter and performing activities of daily living.
She sought to recover a health-care lien of $26,464.30. along with damages for past and future pain and suffering.
The defense's expert in neurosurgery testified that Hearn only suffered soft-tissue injuries to her neck which later resolved. The expert concluded that Hearn's surgery was unrelated to the accident.
The jury found that Damico was negligent and his negligence was a factual cause of harm to Hearn. Jurors determined that Hearn was not negligent. Hearn was determined to receive $56,464.30. She was to receive $26,464 for personal injury and past medical cost and $30,000 for past and future pain and suffering.
This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiffs counsel. Defense counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
—This report first appeared in VerdictSearch, an ALM publication.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 2'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 3New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
- 4Freeman Mathis & Gary Taps Orlando for Third New Florida Office This Year
- 5On The Move: Moore & Van Allen Adds Finance Partner From Morris Manning
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250