Special Section: Intellectual Property
In The Legal's Intellectual Property supplement, read about how government shutdowns affect IP rights, patent litigation in the cannabis industry and infringement issues in artificial intelligence patents.
April 02, 2019 at 08:45 AM
3 minute read
By The Legal Intelligencer
In The Legal's Intellectual Property supplement, read about how government shutdowns affect IP rights, patent litigation in the cannabis industry and infringement issues in artificial intelligence patents.
Download the digital edition here.
Guidance Regarding a Standing Requirement for IPR Appeals in 2 Recent Pharma Cases
Thanks to recent decisions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), we have clarity that both requirements must be met to appeal an adverse final written decision issued during that IPR, and we also have some guidance as to how these requirements will be determined in such cases.
Government Delays, Shutdowns and Slowdowns—How They Affect IP Rights
Damage assessments of the partial government shutdown, the longest in U.S. history, place the cost of the government shutdown to the U.S. economy between $6 billion and $11 billion. Although the threat of another shutdown seems to have passed for now, speculation continues to abound as to what catastrophes await in the event of another government shutdown.
Patent Litigation in the Cannabis Industry—2 Cases to Review
Law students are taught that one purpose served by the civil legal system is to provide predictability in business. For the cannabis industry, predictability remains a work in progress in view of conflicting federal and state laws and regulations.
Pharmaceutical Patent Term Extensions and Patent Term Adjustments: Choose Wisely
For pharmaceutical inventions, which usually undergo a lengthy FDA approval process before any drug can be sold, the most valuable portion of patent term is at the end of the patent's life, after FDA approval.
Infringement Issues in Artificial Intelligence Patents
Artificial intelligence (AI), also referred to as machine-learning technology, refers to software that applies data to incrementally improve its functionality and output.
Testing the Limits of Inherent Obviousness in Patentability
In this article, we briefly review the doctrine of inherency, in the context of an obviousness rejection, as a bar to patentability.
Negative Trade Secrets—What Doesn't Work Actually Has Value
You go to a restaurant and order apple pie. It's the best apple pie you've ever eaten. You want the recipe. You can either ask for it or reverse engineer it. So far so good. But what if you wanted to make an apple pie that was even better? Knowing the recipe will only take you so far. What would really help is knowing what didn't work.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute readFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over USAID Stop-Work Orders
- 2Legaltech Rundown: Davis Wright Tremaine Announces CodeX Partnership, AAA Brings on Maya Markovich As VP, and More
- 3State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation
- 4Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 5Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250