Federal Judge OKs Part of Price-Fixing Lawsuit Against Kennett Square Mushroom Growers
U.S. District Judge Berle M. Schiller allowed supermarket chain Winn-Dixie to proceed with some of its claims against members of the Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative—a consortium of mushroom growers including some based in Kennett Square—while dismissing other claims.
April 09, 2019 at 03:57 PM
3 minute read
A lawsuit alleging that several Kennett Square mushroom farms conspired with other growers to jack up mushroom prices can move forward, in part, a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge Berle M. Schiller of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania allowed Florida-based supermarket chain Winn-Dixie to proceed with some of its claims against members of the Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative—a consortium of mushroom growers including some based in Kennett Square—while dismissing other claims.
Winn-Dixie and co-plaintiff Bi-Lo markets claimed that the mushroom farms violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by engaging in “naked price-fixing and conspired among themselves and in conjunction with [non-EMMC member] distributors to set artificially inflated [mushroom] prices,” according to Schiller's opinion.
The plaintiffs also accused the cooperative of “'meeting and agreeing to fix the price of Agaricus mushrooms' and 'by collectively interfering with, penalizing and retaliating against any non-EMMC growers that sought to sell at prices that were below the artificially-inflated prices set by EMMC,'” Schiller said.
In requesting dismissal of the lawsuit, the defendants claimed the plaintiffs' allegations were not specific enough to move forward, claiming that there are no differences in the allegations against the cooperative and the individual member farms.
But Schiller said that in the early stages of the litigation, it didn't matter.
“Winn-Dixie plaintiffs have furnished a clue as to which of the EMMC members allegedly agreed to the alleged conspiratorial scheme and 'when and where the illicit agreement took place,” Schiller said. “At this stage of the litigation, the court must accept these allegations as true.”
He added, “Whether Winn-Dixie plaintiffs can ultimately prove that each EMMC-member defendant participated identically—as alleged—in the antitrust violations is not a question for resolution at this stage of the litigation.”
However, Schiller did dismiss Winn-Dixie's claims that the members of EMMC sought to establish a monopoly over the mushroom market. He also dismissed claims against several farms over Winn-Dixie's failure to properly serve complaints to them within 90 days.
Patrick Ahern of the Chicago firm Ahern and Associates represents Winn-Dixie and declined to comment on Schiller's ruling.
H. Laddie Montague of Berger Montague in Philadelphia represents the mushroom growers and did not respond to a request for comment.
Winn-Dixie's mushroom antitrust case has been ongoing since December 2015 and is separate from a nationwide class action filed against the EMMC. The class action has resulted in settlements between some growers and plaintiffs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPeople in the News—Jan. 23, 2025—Marshall Dennehey, Duane Morris, Hangley Aronchick
3 minute readPlaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute readPa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 2Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 3Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 4Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 5Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250