Children's Home Hit With $3M Verdict in Death of Teen
A Philadelphia jury handed down a nearly $3 million verdict against a Berks County children's residential treatment home accused of ignoring the warning signs of a mentally ill teenager's intent to commit suicide.
April 11, 2019 at 03:09 PM
4 minute read
Long v. Bethany Children's Home
$3M Verdict
Date of Verdict: April 8.
Court and Case No.: C.P. Philadelphia No. 170403305.
Judge: Sean F. Kennedy.
Type of Action: Negligence, wrongful death.
Injuries: Death.
Plaintiffs Counsel: Michael Pisanchyn and Bradley Moyer, Pisanchyn Firm, Scranton.
Defense Counsel: Francis Deasey, Deasey, Mahoney & Valentini, Philadelphia.
Comment:
A Philadelphia jury handed down a nearly $3 million verdict against a Berks County children's residential treatment home accused of ignoring the warning signs of a mentally ill teenager's intent to commit suicide.
Calvin Long, the father of Carley Long, who at age 16 was struck and killed by a Norfolk Southern freight train on the night of May 6, 2015, after running from the Bethany Children's Home facility in Womelsdorf, sued Bethany for failing to keep his daughter safe.
Long claimed that Bethany was aware of his daughter's multiple suicide attempts, spurred by bipolar disorder, and a previous escape from the facility, but neglected to keep her within sight and hearing distance at all times, according to the plaintiff's court papers.
On the date of the incident, another resident allegedly threatened Carley Long with a knife. According to court papers, Long was told that she had to be kept in the facility longer than expected and would not return home until later. She asked to call her father multiple times, but was denied, court papers said.
“At Bethany the governing regulation is that all children be kept in 'ear shot' and 'eye shot' of staff,” Calvin Long's court papers said. “Even Bethany agrees that the children, and specifically Carley, [were] to be supervised, keeping her with visual and audio range. Bethany did not keep Carley supervised appropriately and she left the house without being noticed.”
Long was represented by Michael Pisanchyn and Bradley Moyer of the Pisanchyn Firm in Scranton. On the verdict, Pisanchyn said he hopes the verdict will encourage Bethany to “stop putting profits ahead of safety.”
“These are the types of cases that are important to our community—the jury who speaks for and sets the community standards clearly decided that Bethany must change,” Pisanchyn said. “Although Carley died, we hope that her name lives on and she did not die in vain.”
Bethany denied responsibility for Carley Long's death.
“There was no evidence of Long's intent to harm herself on the day in question. Numerous staff had interactions with Long on the day/evening of her death, and there is no evidence that she communicated to them an intent/plan to harm herself, much less evidence that she intended specifically to commit suicide by later running out of the home and standing on railroad tracks,” the defendant's court papers said. “Indeed, her last interaction with staff occurred minutes before she left the home and there is no evidence that she was perceived to be an imminent threat to harm herself.”
“Even if Bethany arguably failed to supervise Long, it does not follow that Bethany is legally responsible for her death,” Bethany's papers continued.
Bethany also argued that Pennsylvania law does not allow for wrongful death compensation in cases of suicide.
The children's home's attorney, Francis Deasey of Deasey, Mahoney & Valentini, said he plans to appeal the verdict.
“I have a great deal of respect for the jury system in America, but I totally disagree with the verdict in this case,” Deasey said.
Norfolk Southern was originally a defendant in the lawsuit, but was dismissed after the judge granted its motion for summary judgment.
—P.J. D'Annunzio, of the Law Weekly
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readMembership Has Its Privileges: Bankruptcy Court Examines LLC's Authority to File Bankruptcy
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 2Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 3'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 4New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
- 5Freeman Mathis & Gary Taps Orlando for Third New Florida Office This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250