Pa. and NJ Adult Use—How's That Legalization Thing Coming Along?
Both Pennsylvania and New Jersey have governors who have expressed an interest in legalizing cannabis for recreational or “adult use.”
April 22, 2019 at 01:38 PM
6 minute read
Both Pennsylvania and New Jersey have governors who have expressed an interest in legalizing cannabis for recreational or “adult use.” Polls indicate public support for adult-use cannabis in both states. So, how's legalization going?
It's still a work in progress.
|New Jersey's Gambit
In March the New Jersey Senate pulled a vote on Senate Bill 830, a wide-ranging, heavily negotiated bill that would have made New Jersey the 11th state to allow recreational use. News outlets reported that the bill was expected to fail by fewer than five votes, and at a recent Philadelphia networking event one insider indicated that the bill was just one vote away from passing. Lobbyists and bill sponsors are working to persuade hold-out sponsors in advance of a possible May 2019 vote. If the necessary votes (21 in the New Jersey Senate and 41 in the Assembly) cannot be guaranteed by next month, proponents will need to introduce the bill in January 2020, and start the process over again.
New Jersey legislators have cited a variety of concerns over adult-use legalization, ranging from concerns about impaired driving, allocation of tax revenue and the continuing conflict caused by federal prohibition of marijuana. The scope and handling of cannabis-related expungements was a particular concern because under New Jersey law, distribution of between one and 80 ounces (five pounds) falls within the same statute and is a third-degree crime.
One proposed version of Senate Bill 830 would allow citizens to expunge convictions for third-degree cannabis-related offenses. Under that proposed provision, a person convicted of selling three ounces of marijuana could have that record stricken and would face less difficulty in obtaining credit, employment or housing. But technically, a person also could seek to expunge a conviction for the sale of up to 80 ounces of marijuana. This is the type of provision that might require additional revisions by basing expungement on the amount of cannabis at issue, limiting expungement petitions for distribution to fourth-degree offenses (less than one ounce) or some other compromise.
|Pennsylvania's Push
In Pennsylvania, House Bill 50, sponsored by Allegheny County Rep. Jake Wheatley Jr., proposes a revision of the 2016 Medical Marijuana Act that would allow adult use, generate an estimated $580 million in tax revenue (based on a report from the Pennsylvania auditor general) to be directed toward after-school programs and affordable housing, and provide for expungement of prior cannabis-related convictions. That bill, introduced in February 2019, is before the House Health Committee and is not scheduled for a vote. Wheatley introduced similar legislation, House Bill 2600, in the 2017−2018 session, but that bill was not moved out of the House Health Committee.
On March 19, Pennsylvania state senators Daylin Leach (Delaware/Montgomery counties) and Sharif Street (Philadelphia) released a Co-Sponsorship Memoranda outlining their intention to introduce Senate Bill 350, which the senators state will include provisions for legalizing cannabis use for anyone over 21 years of age, allowing individuals to cultivate up to six cannabis plants for personal use, automatically expunging or commuting cannabis-related criminal sentences, and opening licensing to allow unlimited home-growers, “micro-growers,” dispensaries and lounges. Leach and Street have not indicated when this bill will be introduced. Senator Leach, an author and sponsor of the 2016 Medical Marijuana Act, has previously introduced adult-use cannabis bills. Senator Street is the sponsor of currently pending Senate Bill 465 and Senate Resolution 49, both of which seek to increase access to banking and financial services for cannabis businesses. Both senators are up for reelection in 2020.
Of the 10 states where adult-use cannabis is legal, nine enacted this change through voter referendum. Pennsylvania ballot referendums take the form of constitutional amendments and require approval by a majority of both legislative chambers over two consecutive sessions. Each session runs for a year. The Pennsylvania Legislature has not introduced any proposed constitutional amendments on cannabis and none appear forthcoming. Under New Jersey law, a ballot referendum can be passed by a majority of both chambers overt two consecutive legislative sessions or by a 60 percent supermajority over one session. Thus, voters in the Garden State could see a ballot referendum twice as quickly as voters in the Keystone State. New Jersey's legislators have not sought to introduce a ballot referendum, stating that this would be a “last resort.”
Although Pennsylvania is not putting cannabis on a ballot, the administration is actively soliciting voter input on adult-use marijuana. Lt. Gov. John Fetterman is conducting a listening tour through all 67 Pennsylvania counties at town hall meetings that are being recorded for later release. The tour is on a shoestring budget of $25,000 and relies heavily on social media to publicize the talks. The response has been generally favorable toward legalization, but Rep. Cris Dush (Jefferson) has accused Fetterman of providing pro-cannabis groups with advance notice of the town hall meetings. Fetterman's office denies inviting any particular group to the town hall meetings other than local elected officials. Dush was given the opportunity to express his views at a recent meeting, but it is unclear whether he will appear at future events.
Dush's anti-cannabis position is believed to be mirrored by a significant number of Pennsylvania legislators. Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale recently disclosed that many legislators find it difficult to support legalizing marijuana while the federal government continues to prohibit both medical and adult-use. Pennsylvania's elected officials also share New Jersey's concerns about impaired driving, limiting access to minors and use of tax revenues.
Cannabis legalization in Pennsylvania and New Jersey is a continuing process of negotiation and education within state legislatures. As the 2020 election approaches, the face of legalization may be affected as legislative supporters, opponents and sponsors seek support from their constituencies. The only constant appears to be the commitment of the cannabis community to continue to seek change.
William F. McDevitt is a partner in the Philadelphia office of national law firm Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, where he is a member of the firm's cannabis law practice. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal With GOP
Electronic Travel Authorization for Visa-Exempt Travelers to the US, UK and Europe
Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250