$7.8M Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Over Construction Worker's Fall
A man injured after falling 10 feet from a platform on a construction site has settled his lawsuit against the general contractor for $7.8 million, according to his lawyers.
April 29, 2019 at 03:36 PM
3 minute read
A man injured after falling 10 feet from a platform on a construction site has settled his lawsuit against the general contractor for $7.8 million, according to his lawyers.
The lawsuit was filed against defendant Loftus Construction Inc., by plaintiff Raymond DeMarco, who claimed that a faulty railing on scaffolding caused him to fall to the ground, resulting in spinal injuries and his contracting pneumonia while in the hospital.
DeMarco, who is represented by Larry Bendesky and Adam Pantano of Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett and Bendesky, claimed that Loftus violated Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards by not ensuring safe working conditions.
“This was a completely preventable accident where the general contractor violated OSHA standards and their own safety policies, resulting in a devastating accident that will have a lifetime impact on a decent, hardworking man,” Bendesky said.
The accident occurred Nov. 16, 2015, at the Willow Grove Ave. bridge in Philadelphia. DeMarco, an employee of Jupiter Contracting, was sandblasting and painting the bridge, which passed over Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority train tracks, when he fell.
According to the plaintiff's settlement conference memorandum, DeMarco will never return to work and “his life, and that of his family's, has been destroyed as a result of Loftus' violations of its duties and responsibilities as general contractor on the project.”
Loftus argued in its court papers that compensation was impossible for DeMarco.
“Putting aside the plaintiffs' inability to carry his factual burden of proof since no one knows how this accident occurred, the plaintiffs cannot recover as a matter of law since Loftus was the statutory employer of Mr. DeMarco,” Loftus' papers said.
Loftus claimed that as a statutory employer, it was immune under the Workers' Compensation Act. Loftus also argued that it was owed indemnity by Jupiter.
“Under the subject contract, Jupiter was required to carry $1 million in general liability coverage and $10 million in excess coverage and to name Loftus, PennDOT, the city of Philadelphia, and SEPTA as additional insureds,” Loftus' papers said. “Jupiter's carrier, Nautilus, has agreed to accept the tender, but subject to a reservation of rights which is incorrect both factually and legally, and which is adamantly disputed by Loftus. It is Loftus's position that Nautilus owes Loftus coverage as an additional insured to the full extent of all available coverage (all layers) for all claims, causes of action and damages in this lawsuit.”
John Delany III of Delany McBride represents Loftus and said of the accord in an email, “It is a settlement that occurs when you have very good trial attorneys, and an excellent mediator involved.”
Counsel for Jupiter, Joseph Fowler of Fowler Hirtzel McNulty & Spaulding in Philadelphia, did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Construction Law Update: Best Practices Learned From 3 Recent Appellate Decisions
Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readPa. Appeals Court Rejects 'Statutory Employer' Challenge to $15.5M Worker Injury Verdict
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250