Pa. Courts Still Struggle With the State of Mind Hearsay Exception
In upholding the admission of the note found in the planner, the Pennsylvania Superior Court demonstrated, yet again, that the “state of mind” exception to the ban on hearsay, that found in Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 803(3), is all-too-often misunderstood or misapplied.
May 01, 2019 at 01:17 PM
6 minute read
The day a woman died, a note was found on her day planner in her handwriting that read, “If something happens to me—Joe.” Needless to say, “Joe” ended up charged with murder. And in upholding the admission of the note found in the planner, the Pennsylvania Superior Court demonstrated, yet again, that the “state of mind” exception to the ban on hearsay, that found in Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 803(3), is all-too-often misunderstood or misapplied.
What is the state of mind exception? It has two components common to all hearsay—it must include an assertion and that assertion must be offered for its truth. And there is more. The assertion must satisfy the rule, which provides for a statement of the declarant's then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent or plan) or emotional, sensory or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant's will.
Typical examples include, “I'm happy,” “I'm frustrated,” “I'm tired,” “my back hurts,” or “I plan on going to the library at 2 p.m.” Each is, in effect, a present sense impression of what the declarant is feeling at that moment.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250