Key to Advancing, Sustaining Diversity in Law Firms—Open the Door of Opportunity
The development and advancement of associates to partner, and partners within the partnership, boils down to just a few factors: increasing opportunities to lead client relationships, obtain origination credits and work on matters of significance.
May 03, 2019 at 01:44 PM
4 minute read
Earlier this year, over 150 corporate general counsel and chief legal officers signed on to an open letter directed to law firms. That letter voices frustration over the lack of promotions and advancement of diverse associates and partners within large law firms. It also threatens to move substantial business to law firms with more diversity in their ranks. However, whether it ultimately moves the dial depends on what steps corporations and the firms that represent them take to translate these beliefs into action. We propose the following simple (if not necessarily easy to implement) perspective on what those next steps require.
The development and advancement of associates to partner, and partners within the partnership, boils down to just a few factors: increasing opportunities to lead client relationships, obtain origination credits and work on matters of significance. Unfortunately, addressing these issues may carry both perceived financial and political consequences by disrupting an established workflow or firm hierarchy, and concerns about business interruption from the perspective of clients who have enjoyed satisfactory representation and long-standing relationships with a firm's nondiverse partners.
Consider the example of a diverse associate who has just been promoted to partner. No doubt, the associate demonstrated characteristics warranting the promotion—excellent work product, business development potential, teamwork, work ethic, leadership qualities, etc. Assume further that the new partner has some first-chair experience but only on “smaller” matters for large clients or, alternatively, matters for “smaller” clients. Too often, the careers of newly minted diverse partners fitting this profile stall at this point. The reality is that their advancement (including their ability to influence future hiring decisions and overall firm management) hinges to a large degree on: a senior partner ceding an opportunity to lead a significant matter/relationship, or a client's willingness to provide a “first-chair” opportunity even at the cost of foregoing using a nondiverse lawyer with whom they have a long and comfortable relationship. For the diverse partner, if they repeatedly see that neither the senior partners nor the clients are willing to open the door of opportunity, they will leave, opting instead to go in-house, start their own firm, join another firm where the door appears more open or take a position in the public sector, thereby perpetuating the cycle of lack of diversity in the large firm they left.
Thus, the focus of the dialogue between clients and law firms, if it is to be a meaningful one, must be on creating opportunity. The conversation needs to be focused single-mindedly on this goal, even at the risk of upsetting the status quo. What concrete steps can clients and law firms partner together on to provide diverse attorneys more opportunities to lead key matters? Gain influence within the firm? Originate business? Build a portfolio of marketable experience that will sustain a career, not just a “one time” promotion? What steps can clients and firms take to encourage/incentivize the senior lawyers currently holding the business to open the door for their more junior diverse colleagues? What steps can GCs take to incentivize the lawyers in their departments who select counsel choose the diverse attorney? Without clearer direction and alignment on the answers to these tough questions, such open letters may not get the traction their authors hope for.
Nipun J. Patel is a commercial litigator and founding partner of Holland & Knight's Philadelphia office. He is co-chair of the Philadelphia office's diversity committee, president of the South Asian Bar Association and a member of the Philadelphia Diversity Law Group's board of directors.
Rick Richardson is vice president and associate general counsel, dispute resolution and prevention, for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Richardson is a member of GSK legal's diversity and inclusion steering team, is on the admissions committee and advisory council of the National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms and is GSK's representative to the inclusion initiative.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSome Clients Are Pushing for Transparency Surrounding Origination Credits
5 minute readAre Jurors Angrier? Consultants Say There's More to the Story Than That
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250