Pennsylvania's Death Penalty Is in Peril—We Can, and Must, Do Better
The court found that Eric Frein ambushed Cpl. Bryon K. Dickson II with "malice and the specific intent to kill," and his conduct warranted the death penalty. Now Frein will go to Pennsylvania's death row with little chance of ever being executed.
May 09, 2019 at 12:25 PM
6 minute read
Matthew T. Mangino
Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of convicted cop killer Eric Frein. The court's 45-page opinion, written by Justice Debra Todd, found Frein's conviction was “supported by overwhelming evidence.”
The high court found that the Pennsylvania State Police violated Frein's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights by questioning him after he invoked his right to remain silent and his right to an attorney. However, the court found those violations to be harmless and not prejudicial.
The Fifth and Sixth Amendment protections are relevant in any criminal prosecution. The right to counsel and the right to remain silent are fundamental. A thorough analysis by the court was warranted.
The court also refused to grant Frein a new trial on additional grounds that are more nuanced and specific to the death penalty. First, the court did not believe that the victim impact evidence presented by the prosecution during the penalty phase of the trial was prejudicial. Although the defense presented 29 mitigating factors, the jury found none and therefore a potentially flawed jury instruction had no impact on the verdict.
The court found that Frein ambushed Cpl. Bryon K. Dickson II with “malice and the specific intent to kill,” and his conduct warranted the death penalty. Now Frein will go to Pennsylvania's death row with little chance of ever being executed.
The death penalty has been around in its modern form for about 43 years. In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the death penalty. The court ruled in Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), that the death penalty was unconstitutional, violating the Eighth Amendment ban against cruel and unusual punishment. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart wrote, “These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual.”
The decision forced state legislatures to review the death penalty and eliminate the arbitrary, capricious and racially discriminatory aspects of capital punishment. The court suggested that states establish criteria to direct and limit death sentences and provide the sentencing authority with information about the accused's character and record.
In 1976, the Supreme Court in Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), found that three of five states that amended their death penalty statute—Georgia, Florida and Texas—did conform to the directives of Furman. The death penalty was back.
Since Gregg, there have been 1,495 men and women executed nationwide. Three of those executions took place in Pennsylvania. Keith Zettlemoyer, Leon Moser and Gary M. Heidnik are the only men to have been executed in Pennsylvania since 1976. The last execution in Pennsylvania was carried out on July 6, 1999.
In February 2015, Gov. Tom Wolf announced a moratorium on the death penalty pending a review of the Pennsylvania Task Force and Advisory Commission on Capital Punishment Report, and for purposes of full disclosure I was a member of that task force. At the time, the governor said that the decision was not based on sympathy for the inmates, but out of concern over flaws in the system. He stated that as it stood, the system is an endless cycle of court proceedings, and is ineffective, unjust and expensive.
The report took the advisory commission nearly seven years to complete. The 280-page report found, among other things, that the death penalty is costly, inconsistently applied geographically across the state, and disproportionately impacts people with intellectual disability and mental illness.
Yet, nearly a year after the report and four years after the governor's moratorium nothing has been done to fix the death penalty. But, there is bipartisan action by Philadelphia Democrat House member Christopher M. Rabb and Lebanon Republican Francis X. Ryan to abolish Pennsylvania's death penalty.
In a co-sponsored memo Rabb and Ryan assert, “Although Pennsylvania has the country's fifth highest death row population, currently at 175 inmates, only three executions have occurred in recent decades, and the state has not executed anyone who did not voluntarily give up their appeals in more than 50 years. According to a Reading Eagle analysis, those three executions have cost taxpayers $816 million.”
This comes at a time when support for the death penalty is waning. Twenty states and the District of Columbia have abolished capital punishment. According to the New York Times, four additional states—including Pennsylvania—have imposed moratoriums on executions. Not only are executions down, death sentences are down as well. In 2018, 14 states and the federal government imposed death sentences, more than haif of those 42 death sentences came from four states.
Disdain for the death penalty is not new. In 1994, Justice Harry Blackmun famously said, “From this day forward I no longer shall tinker with the machinery of death.” Blackmun had voted to restore the death penalty and even to approve mandatory death sentences. But after 25 years, he said, “I feel morally and intellectually obligated simply to concede that the death penalty experiment has failed.”
More recently, Supreme Court Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote in a 2015 dissent—joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg—in Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), that it was “highly likely that the death penalty violates the Eighth Amendment,” the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment.
Yet, the death penalty continues. A closer look at the current status of capital punishment is revealing. Just 10 states are responsible for about 83 percent of executions since 1976.
Evolving standards of decency in a “mature society,” the analysis used to outlaw the execution of juveniles and those intellectually disabled, have made carrying out of executions increasingly rare nationwide. Last year, there were 25 executions carried out in the United States. All 25 were carried out in only eight states.
So far this year there have been five executions nationwide. There are approximately 2,721 men and women on death row according to the Death Penalty Information Center, an anti-death penalty advocacy group.
If not another person was sentenced to death in this country, at the current rate of executions, it would take 108 years to close the doors on death row. Pennsylvania can, and must, do better.
Matthew T. Mangino is of counsel with Luxenberg, Garbett, Kelly & George. His book “The Executioner's Toll, 2010″ was released by McFarland Publishing. You can reach him at www.mattmangino.com and follow him on Twitter @MatthewTMangino.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/38/82/ff7b611443519b770a19692401f4/weilheimer-neary-henry-767x633.jpg)
Pa. Federal District Courts Reach Full Complement Following Latest Confirmation
![The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal' The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/01/Philadelphia-City-Hall-08-767x633.jpg)
The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute read![Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ba/3b/495247be47fe8b0ba5fcd60e024b/citizens-bank-sign-767x633.jpg)
Federal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute read![Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/07/18-wheeler-semi-truck-767x633.jpg)
Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.