Former JCB Chief Counsel Joins Saxton & Stump in Harrisburg
Robert Graci, who retired as the state Judicial Conduct Board's chief counsel last August, has joined Lancaster-based Saxton & Stump as senior counsel in its Harrisburg office.
May 16, 2019 at 05:01 PM
4 minute read
Robert Graci, who retired as the Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board's chief counsel last August, has joined Lancaster-based Saxton & Stump as senior counsel in its Harrisburg office.
Graci's practice will focus on appellate advocacy and internal investigations, as well as Title IX work on behalf of educational institutions. He will also provide alternative dispute resolution services through Saxton & Stump's subsidiary, Optimal Dispute Resolutions.
Graci said he was introduced to the firm's CEO, James Saxton, by retired U.S. District Chief Judge Lawrence Stengel of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who joined Saxton & Stump last September.
LIkewise, Saxton said it was Stengel who first suggested bringing Graci on board.
“Judge Stengel brought the idea up and we very quickly rallied around it,” Saxton said.
According to Saxton, Stengel's hire last year was a major step toward the firm strengthening its internal investigations capabilities and Graci's addition is another significant building block for the practice.
Both Graci and Stengel “have just unbelievable experience, if you think about it, solving complex problems and looking at things differently,” Saxton said.
Graci noted that, in addition to his experience overseeing ethics probes at the JCB, he previously led grand jury investigations during his time with the state Attorney General's Office and represented individuals before grand juries when he was in private practice at Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott in Harrisburg. Graci also served as a Superior Court judge from 2002 until 2004, prior to joining Eckert Seamans.
And from a more personal perspective, Graci said, the firm offered everything he was looking for at this stage in his career.
He said he retired from the JCB last year to spend more time with his wife, children and grandchildren, but “it was never my intention to be completely divorced from the practice of law.”
“I was looking for a better balance between my professional life and private life,” he said, adding, “They made me a very attractive offer with the type of flexibility that will allow me to achieve that balance I was looking for.”
Graci said he had spoken with a few other firms about possibly joining them but was drawn to the strategic approach to growth and the culture of teamwork Saxton described during their initial meeting.
“When I met with him for the first time, he actually had a multi-slide PowerPoint,” Graci recalled. “The way he explained his vision and the way the firm operates on many different levels really impressed me.”
Saxton & Stump, which formed four years ago and currently has 37 lawyers, is undeniably in growth mode.
“Four years ago they were at 16 lawyers, now they're between 35 and 40, and they expect to add another eight or nine before the end of the year,” Graci said, noting that the firm “is growing by bringing in real leaders in their fields.”
In April, the firm hired former Tucker Arensberg shareholder Anthony Foschi to establish a hospitality practice. In March, it brought on John Hogan from Stevens & Lee (where Saxton & Stump's founders originally defected from) to chair of its corporate health care and life sciences group. Last June, the firm launched an intellectual property practice, hiring shareholder Bruce Wolstoncroft from McNees Wallace & Nurick to lead it.
Saxton said the firm is also in the process of building out its Harrisburg office to triple its size to accommodate future growth, including some more planned additions to the internal investigations and Title IX practice in the near future. The highly specialized nature of that practice requires a real commitment on the part of firms attempting to be major players in that space, he noted.
“There many good firms that have existing practices, but it is a niche practice that you have to, as a firm, be willing to invest in,” Saxton said. “You've got to get individuals like Judge Stengel, like Judge Graci, that have a depth of experience and you've got to be willing to support them …[internal investigations and Title IX matters] are extraordinarily complicated and serious and you've got to be ready to put the resources forward.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPhiladelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
3 minute readPhila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
3 minute readPhila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250