Pharma Company to Pay $3.5M to Resolve Kickback Claims
A pharmaceutical company accused of illegally using benefits to entice physicians to prescribe its dermatology drugs has settled those claims with the federal government for $3.5 million, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has announced.
May 30, 2019 at 04:57 PM
3 minute read
Photo: Maryna Pleshkun/Shutterstock.com
A pharmaceutical company accused of illegally using benefits to entice physicians to prescribe its dermatology drugs has settled those claims with the federal government for $3.5 million, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania has announced.
According to the settlement agreement, Spanish drugmaker Almirall, formerly known as Aqua Pharmaceuticals, will make the payment to resolve claims that between 2012 and 2017, it used its sales representatives and other employees to treat physicians to meals, entertainment, trips, gift cards and gifts to coax them into prescribing its drugs. Prosecutors also claim that Aqua hired doctors for speaking engagements, advisory boards and consulting services for the same reason. Almirall maintains executive offices in Exton.
The whistleblower case was brought under the False Claims Act by the U.S. Attorney's Office in cooperation with the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
“Federal law is designed to ensure that doctors and other providers are not improperly influenced by pharmaceutical companies in deciding which drugs to prescribe,” said U.S. Attorney William McSwain in a statement Wednesday. “Our office will do everything in its power to ensure that pharmaceutical companies and prescribers are playing by the rules and that they are not enriching themselves at the expense of patients' well-being, especially those covered by Medicare and Tricare, the insurance for members of the armed services. This settlement is just the latest example of our office's strong partnership with HHS-OIG and the Defense Health Agency to protect the integrity of our health care programs.”
Almirall's counsel, Eric Breslin of Duane Morris in New York City, did not respond to a request for comment.
“Pharmaceutical companies that ignore rules designed to protect patients will be held accountable. Patients must be able to trust that decisions made by their doctors are based on unbiased professional judgment and not personal gain,” said Maureen R. Dixon, special agent in charge of the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in Philadelphia. “We will continue to work with the U.S. Attorney's Office in this District to root out all forms of waste, fraud and abuse in our federal health care programs.”
According to prosecutors, the whistleblower in the case will receive $735,000 as her share of the recovery in the case. That individual was represented by Brian J. McCormick Jr. of Ross Feller Casey and Claudine Q. Homolash of the CQH Firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/01/Ozempic-767x633.jpg)
Ozempic Defendants Seek to Shave 'Tacked On' Claims From MDL Complaint
3 minute read![Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2023/05/Johnsons-Talc-Powder-6-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiff Argues Jury's $22M Punitive Damages Finding Undermines J&J's Talc Trial Win
4 minute read!['Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal 'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/thelegalintelligencer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/407/2024/09/Judge-Joshua-Roberts-767x633.jpg)
'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
3 minute read![Pittsburgh Jury Tries to Award $22M Against J&J in Talc Case Despite Handing Up Defense Verdict Pittsburgh Jury Tries to Award $22M Against J&J in Talc Case Despite Handing Up Defense Verdict](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/31/28/31a2a5124c42a4922842768bfba7/johnson-johnson-vision-767x633.jpg)
Pittsburgh Jury Tries to Award $22M Against J&J in Talc Case Despite Handing Up Defense Verdict
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 2Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers and Clients Left 'Relying on the Governments to Sort This Out'
- 5Willkie Adds Five-Lawyer Team From Quinn Emanuel in Germany
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250