The Potential (and Potential Pitfalls) of Blockchain in the Construction Industry
Blockchain, essentially a digital and distributed record of data, already is innovating the supply chain and financial sectors. Now, in what might not at first seem like a natural fit, it has the largely unrealized potential to make a big mark on the construction industry.
May 31, 2019 at 01:17 PM
6 minute read
Technology continues to change the way we work and live in surprising ways. It was hardly five years ago when the likes of ride-share apps like Uber and Lyft ushered in the onset of the gig economy that is making lives easier for people around the globe. Technology also has changed the way some have thought about currency, which thrust cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, into the spotlight.
But it's Bitcoin's behind-the-scene technology—blockchain—that is enabling and evolving these developments and making an equally impactful role in transforming traditional industries. Blockchain, essentially a digital and distributed record of data, already is innovating the supply chain and financial sectors. Now, in what might not at first seem like a natural fit, it has the largely unrealized potential to make a big mark on the construction industry.
An international construction firm, in fact, recently signed a significant supply chain management deal with a U.S. blockchain company to track assets and streamline facility management. Deals like that are currently the exception rather than the rule, but the implications of how blockchain can affect contracts in the future are too large to ignore, and already we're seeing it used in certain design processes.
Laws are not necessarily keeping pace with these rapidly changing developments, making it critical to consider the impacts of the use of technology on a project. Let's break it down.
|How Blockchain Works
Eliminating reams of paper and bringing transparency to networks, blockchain creates a database consisting of “blocks” of information that can be created and altered by those with access to a given network. These blocks are connected by “chains” showing the work between the original block and the new or amended information. A popular analogy for blockchain is to think of it as a bank ledger, only everyone in the network has a copy.
With the information distributed among those with access to the network—in construction, these might be project owners, contractors, subcontractors, architects, etc.—they can monitor and approve changes. This transparency ideally provides a layer of security because there is no central location for a hacker to capture encrypted data.
|How Smart Contracts Might Help Builders
Depending on the industry, blockchain has multiple uses. The smart contract built with blockchain technology has future potential in the construction industry and can allow for easy verification and administration of contracts and has the potential to streamline payment and claim procedures. Being written in code, these types of contracts can be partially or fully self-executing and self-enforcing.
In construction, the unique aspects of each project often render using a cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all approach to contracting difficult. Even standardized contract documents are modified significantly because each project is different. Changes to the contract documents (including change orders), the project schedule and the like can become unwieldy on bigger jobs, and with more dollars at stake, smart contract technology is likely to find its place in the construction industry, beginning with larger projects.
From a technology standpoint, however, the construction industry historically has been slower to embrace change than some other industries. However, when the tangible benefits of adopting new technology become real, change will follow, and smart contracts likely will become more frequently used in the not-too-distant future.
|How Blockchain Can Help BIM
One area in construction where an innovative technology already is being used is known as building information modeling (BIM). BIM is a process in which an intelligent, three-dimensional model-based design of a project is built digitally to ensure accuracy in construction and limit errors.
It's an especially exciting technology for architects because it catches interference among various shop drawings which otherwise may not be obvious until construction. For example, think of a series of blueprints overlaying each other. It's hard to visualize those plans until the project is in 3-D—and then there might be a pipe going through a doorway no one noticed until it actually was built. BIM can help minimize those mistakes.
Blockchain technology allows for easier tracking and coordination among the different trades using BIM for a project to the extent they are given access to the model. Alterations can be seen as they happen, and any errors should be caught in the digital space before they get to the worksite.
|The Potential to Make Projects Vulnerable
While technology can add convenience and efficiency, the more people with access to technological information, the more opportunities there are for a cyber threat. The more project participants having access to the BIM, for example, the more opportunities there are for scamming and cyber deception. Every time someone opens the model, there exists the potential to impact the model. In smart contracts, too, a simple bug or typo in the code can create risks. As long as humans and technology interface, the potential for human error will exist.
Sophisticated hackers always are adapting to changes in cybersecurity, and there is an ongoing need for IT experts in not only construction, but in most industries in the United States. Even with the proper staffing, if a seasoned cybercriminal is intent on stealing someone's data, it can be very difficult to prevent.
What happens if important data, intellectual property or trade secrets are stolen or exposed? If there are losses, who is liable?
|How to Protect Yourself
If a party is dealing with data in any appreciable way, in addition to implementing appropriate IT protections and protocols, they should consult not only with an attorney to review and draft contract language to protect the party from liability for cyber risk, but they also should look into getting appropriate cybersecurity insurance to cover any losses.
New technology, as always, will revolutionize the construction industry. However, construction professionals will need to be well-prepared in order to seize the benefits and opportunities that technology brings while avoiding the potential pitfalls.
Brandon B. Rothey is a trial lawyer at Pittsburgh-based law firm Meyer, Unkovic & Scott. He protects businesses, professionals and their business interests. Contact him at [email protected].
Joshua Lorenz is an attorney at the firm. He focuses his practice on construction and real estate law and litigation. Contact him at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDelivery Driver's Slip-and-Fall Suit Slides Forward Against Equipment Rental Company
4 minute readPa. Construction Law Update: Best Practices Learned From 3 Recent Appellate Decisions
Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readPa. Appeals Court Rejects 'Statutory Employer' Challenge to $15.5M Worker Injury Verdict
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250