Texas Still a Land of Opportunity for Midsize Firms—Including Pa. Firms
Three midsize firms, including Pittsburgh's Babst Calland Clements and Zomnir, made significant group acquisitions this week in Texas, and recruiters say the activity will likely continue.
June 10, 2019 at 02:41 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
It's been a busy week for midsize firms in the Lone Star State—and, by extension, at least one in the Keystone State.
Three midsize firms made significant group acquisitions this week in Texas, as they looked to bulk up targeted practices. And in each case, the acquired group touted their new firm's place in the legal midmarket as a selling point.
Early in the week, technology-focused Munck Wilson Mandala acquired four-lawyer litigation firm Okon Hannagan, adding to its principal office in Dallas. Founder Melanie Okon said she and partner Susan Hannagan wanted to combine with a larger firm so they could land more complex litigation work.
On Wednesday another Dallas-headquartered firm, Shackelford, Bowen, McKinley & Norton, added a fifth office to its Texas footprint, bringing on a group of seven commercial litigators from Winstead. Partner Jay Brown said he was attracted to the midsize regional firm because it was focused on client service, providing its lawyers with rate flexibility and a speedy rate-approval process, while also having a strong Texas footprint.
Also Wednesday, midsize firm Babst Calland Clements and Zomnir, which is headquartered in Pittsburgh, planted a flag in Texas by acquiring Chambers Law Firm, a four-lawyer shop in The Woodlands, near Houston, focused on oil and gas law.
Shareholder Les Chambers, who will lead the firm's new office, said he hadn't been actively seeking a merger partner, but Babst Calland's courtship started at just the right time. “We were at a point where we really needed to probably double in size,” he said.
Local recruiters said all this activity shows that Texas remains a hot market. And opportunity abounds for midsize firms in particular, they said.
“Firms are still looking to get into Texas,” even with some economic uncertainty the horizon, said Jack Hopper, of Kinney Recruiting.
Last year, Texas was a major destination, and the location of some of the biggest mergers of 2018. This year hasn't been marked by as many major combinations—at least not yet—but there have been a number of instances of smaller practices moving to or joining up with midsize or super-regional firms.
“The firms that get the headlines are the elite firms who are targeting the corporate M&A, private equity and IP litigation [work], things like that,” said Lee Allbritton, a founding partner at Amicus Search Group in Austin. But “a significant slice of the market in Texas [is made up of] middle-market, middle rate Texas firms.”
For many local clients, “The Am Law firms are too big, the boutiques are too small. There is safety and resources in the middle that makes sense,” Allbritton added.
That reality has created some of the recent moves.
For smaller firms like Okon Hannagan or Chambers, “you have to decide if you're going to stay a boutique, or do we want to grow our presence?” Hopper said. ”There's strength in numbers.”
And for those at Am Law 200 firms, even “super-regional” ones like Winstead, pressure on billing rates is a real consideration, especially for litigators, Hopper said. Midsize firms are able to offer a bit more flexibility.
“There's a lot of great middle-market private companies, as well as public companies in Texas. They don't have the deep pockets,” Hopper said. “There's a great opportunity to go out and get that business with those middle-market companies because your bill rates are lower.”
Even the biggest public companies are looking to save on legal spend, unless they're dealing with bet-the-company litigation, as their general counsel answer to shareholders, Hopper added.
“It's an accelerating trend, we're seeing it increase,” Allbritton said, referring to midsize expansion through mini-mergers.
And if the economy takes a turn, those midsize firms could benefit from the growth, he noted. That's especially true for those with an emphasis on litigation, since disputes tend to pick up in a bad economy.
“I think the middle-market firms will act do well in a downturn, relatively speaking to the elites,” Allbritton said. “That's primarily due to the perception that there is more client value and a more elastic rate structure.”
Brenda Sapino Jeffreys contributed to this report.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDebtor-Owner Allowed to Modify Mortgage in Bankruptcy Even if Debtor Is Not Obligor Under the Mortgage Loan
7 minute readBig Law Communications, Media Attorneys Brace for Changes Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250