2019 Lifetime Achievement Winner—Tom Brophy
Tom Brophy joined Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin as a paralegal in 1979 earning his law degree at night.
June 13, 2019 at 05:34 PM
5 minute read
By The Legal Intelligencer
Tom Brophy, Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin
Brophy joined Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin as a paralegal in 1979 earning his law degree at night. In 1987, he was elected shareholder and handpicked to manage the firm's Norristown office. Demonstrating skill and vision, Brophy assumed responsibility for all of the firm's regional offices in 1989. He led the firm's continued growth by opening offices in Wilmington, Delaware, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh, Scranton, Lancaster, Bethlehem and Roseland.
At the same time, Brophy made a name for himself handling and trying complex products liability, medical malpractice and high-exposure general liability cases.
After assuming the roles of president and CEO, he guided the firm's further expansion into four offices in Florida, three offices in New York and two offices in Ohio.
He implemented innovative programs within the firm that helped solidify it into one of the leading civil litigation defense firms in the country. He helped to reorganize the firm into four practice departments; devised a quality control system whereby each attorney in the firm is audited on the quality of work annually; launched a NITA-based two-day trial advocacy program; expanded the firm's professional training such that the firm now hosts over 100 internal CLE's annually; and developed new practice areas to include maritime, aviation, trucking and transportation, employment practices and more.
The legal profession is constantly evolving and that evolution only seems to have accelerated in recent years. What's the biggest change you've seen in the profession during your career?
I have been at Marshall Dennehey for 40 years. In response to this question, I'd like to identify the two biggest changes that I have seen in the legal profession during my career. The first would be the ever-expanding use of technology. The technology that is available today, the way it is used, and the demands both personal and professional that it creates, is the single biggest change that I've seen during my career.
However, the increasing size of law firms is also a very significant change. To a large extent, technology facilitates the continued growth of law firms. The technology enables things to be done on a macro scale. The technology connects attorneys and clients throughout the country and throughout the world, enabling them to take advantage of the economies of scale that come with increased size. Corporations grow larger. Insurance companies grow larger. They want to use larger law firms with a greater range of expertise, with greater depth of personnel, and greater geographic coverage. Generally, larger law firms will have better technology than smaller law firms because larger firms can spread the cost of technology over a greater number of people.
What is one thing about the profession that has remained unchanged over the years?
Notwithstanding the increased size of law firms and the increased use of technology, the law is still a people business. Ultimately, while technology can facilitate decision-making and communication, human beings make the decisions that shape the law and have the biggest impact on organizations and relationships. The technology that exists is generally available to all attorneys to one degree or another; thus the differentiator among lawyers and law firms is attorney competency, initiative, creativity and passion.
Name one thing you've learned over the course of your career that you wish you knew as a young lawyer.
The single biggest challenge for most lawyers is work-life balance. As lawyers, the demands on our time can change overnight. As children, spouses, and parents, the demands on our time can change overnight. Often we are worried because we have too much work; on other occasions we are worried because we have too little.
Because of these demands, the life of any successful lawyer is one of constantly shifting priorities and time management. At times it is difficult to maintain firm boundaries between our professional and personal lives. The difficulty in maintaining these boundaries has been exacerbated by technology. Quite often I've found work creeping into all aspects of my life. I wish I knew earlier in my life how to set and maintain those boundaries. As I look back over my career, I see things that I didn't have to do, meetings that I didn't have to attend, or assignments that I did not have to accept that would have freed up more time to spend with family and friends. I'd like to have recognized that earlier in my career. On the other hand, there were assignments that I accepted that, at the time, didn't seem momentous that led to significant opportunities for me. The challenge is knowing how to balance those demands in real time.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPa. Superior Court Rules Pizza Chain Liable for Franchisee Driver's Crash
4 minute readSuperior Court Re-examines Death of a Party Pending a Divorce Action
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
- 2Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 3Georgia Law Schools Seeing 24% More Applicants This Year
- 4After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
- 5‘Keep Men Out’: Female Swimmers Sue Ivy Leagues Over Lia Thomas’ Sweep
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250