2019 Distinguished Leader—Sherrie Savett
Last year was a watershed year for Berger Montague, and the firm's successes are a testament to the strong leadership provided by its chairwoman, Sherrie Savett.
June 15, 2019 at 02:24 PM
4 minute read
By The Legal Intelligencer
Sherrie Savett, Berger Montague
Last year was a watershed year for Berger Montague, and the firm's successes are a testament to the strong leadership provided by its chairwoman, Sherrie Savett. Savett earned national attention when she took the helm of Berger Montague as the firm's first female chair, and as one of the few women in the country to lead such a large and prominent firm. Most significantly, under Savett's leadership, the firm moved from the historical brownstone where it had been founded 1970 to a dazzlingly redesigned new space in a modern office tower. As chairwoman, Savett has used her vision and leadership to ensure the new offices would be world-class, and to make the move as seamless as possible.
In addition to moving its headquarters, the firm grew under Savett's leadership. The firm added one staff attorney to its Minneapolis office, one associate to its antitrust group, one senior counsel to its consumer protection and insurance fraud group and one associate to its qui tam group, of which Savett is also the co-head.
While fulfilling her duties as chairwoman, Savett also continued to serve as an example of excellence and determination in her own practice. Savett and her team of attorneys are currently lead counsel in many qui tam, securities cases and consumer class action cases, several of which are in active discovery against some of the largest and most aggressive defense firms in the world. In November, Savett filed a major consumer class action against the e-cigarette manufacturer Juul Labs. Savett and her colleagues at the firm also won a major, precedent-setting victory in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Silver v. Omnicare, which reversed the district court's decision to grant the defendants summary judgment and clarified questions regarding the False Claims Act's public disclosure bar.
What career path would you have pursued if you weren't a lawyer?
I considered becoming an actress or a psychiatrist. Since I love competition, analyzing people and their motivations, performing and I love a good challenge, I decided that being a litigator was more practical.
Name a mentor or someone you admire.
My most important mentor was my dad, Nathan I. Raiken, an unsung World War II hero who won the Bronze Star but never told us, and who became a lawyer at the age of 40 after going to Temple Law School at night when he had a small food market on Ridge Avenue and four kids.
My other great mentor was my partner, Laddie Montague, who in his quiet, dignified way has the most keen intellect, judgment and sensitivity to every situation. Every time I discussed a difficult issue with him, we found a good solution together.
What is the best advice you ever received?
The best advice I ever received was to remain true to myself, follow my instincts to be straightforward and honest and never give up when you believe you are right.
In 50 words or less, what does the legal profession need to do to prepare the next generation of lawyers?
The legal profession needs to emphasize humanity and honesty and truthfulness. Litigation has become a form of brutal warfare. Lawyers need to learn that they can get the results they desire for their clients, but they don't have to be rude or distort the facts in ways that are misleading. There needs to be more courtesy and respect between opponents.
What's the one piece of advice would you give someone when dealing with a crisis?
Stay calm. Sleep on important decisions and don't make quick rash judgments. Organize a good small team around you and discuss all aspects of the problem before acting. Group thinking produces great results.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Allows Elderly Woman's Consumer Protection Suit to Proceed Against Citizens Bank
5 minute readJudge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
4 minute readSupreme Court's Ruling in 'Students for Fair Admissions' and Its Impact on DEI Initiatives in the Workplace
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250